Luke-Jr [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-03-13 📝 Original message:On Wednesday, March 13, ...
📅 Original date posted:2013-03-13
📝 Original message:On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 3:18:36 PM Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> > If we're going to consider doing this, at minimum we need to also
>
> I beg people to not derail discussion about fixing things with
> discussion of other controversial changes.
I figured 2 MB in 2-3 years was fairly uncontroversial.
If not, let's scrap that idea for now.
> Luke-jr, any chance in getting you to revise your proposal to narrow
> the scope to things that don't need serious debate?
It was a one-time "start the conversation" proposal.
I expect what we end up going with may be substantially different.
Luke
📝 Original message:On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 3:18:36 PM Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> > If we're going to consider doing this, at minimum we need to also
>
> I beg people to not derail discussion about fixing things with
> discussion of other controversial changes.
I figured 2 MB in 2-3 years was fairly uncontroversial.
If not, let's scrap that idea for now.
> Luke-jr, any chance in getting you to revise your proposal to narrow
> the scope to things that don't need serious debate?
It was a one-time "start the conversation" proposal.
I expect what we end up going with may be substantially different.
Luke