Benjamin Mord [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2018-01-29 📝 Original message: Hi, One topic I can't ...
📅 Original date posted:2018-01-29
📝 Original message:
Hi,
One topic I can't seem to find in the BOLTs is how lightning nodes maintain
consensus during or after a fork of the underlying blockchain(s). For
example, channel_announcement messages use a chain_hash, defined as hash of
underlying block chain's genesis block, to identify the currency in use.
Today, one might ask which hash identifies BTC as opposed to BCH?
A more difficult question arises in how existing channels handle
intentional forks which arise after funding of a payment channel.
An even more difficult question arises in the handling of unintentional
forks, as documented for example in BIP 50.
Have these scenarios been analyzed / designed yet, or does that work remain?
Thanks!
Ben
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20180129/7b478ccf/attachment.html>
📝 Original message:
Hi,
One topic I can't seem to find in the BOLTs is how lightning nodes maintain
consensus during or after a fork of the underlying blockchain(s). For
example, channel_announcement messages use a chain_hash, defined as hash of
underlying block chain's genesis block, to identify the currency in use.
Today, one might ask which hash identifies BTC as opposed to BCH?
A more difficult question arises in how existing channels handle
intentional forks which arise after funding of a payment channel.
An even more difficult question arises in the handling of unintentional
forks, as documented for example in BIP 50.
Have these scenarios been analyzed / designed yet, or does that work remain?
Thanks!
Ben
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20180129/7b478ccf/attachment.html>