joe2015 at openmailbox.org [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-12-31 📝 Original message:> So I'm very strongly ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-12-31
📝 Original message:> So I'm very strongly against this "generalized softfork" idea -- I also
> don't
> see how upgraded nodes and non-upgraded nodes can possibly end up with
> the same
> UTXO set.
The only way for non-upgraded nodes to get the correct UTXO set is to
upgrade.
It is important to keep in mind this was proposed as an alternative to a
hardfork. With a hardfork the UTXOs also diverge as upgraded and
non-upgraded clients follow different chains.
--joe.
📝 Original message:> So I'm very strongly against this "generalized softfork" idea -- I also
> don't
> see how upgraded nodes and non-upgraded nodes can possibly end up with
> the same
> UTXO set.
The only way for non-upgraded nodes to get the correct UTXO set is to
upgrade.
It is important to keep in mind this was proposed as an alternative to a
hardfork. With a hardfork the UTXOs also diverge as upgraded and
non-upgraded clients follow different chains.
--joe.