erikcason on Nostr: It’s a complex question that I resent people think can easily or sensitively ...
It’s a complex question that I resent people think can easily or sensitively discussed on forums like this because of the extremely nuanced nature of not only the conversation, content and deep historical knowledge needed to discuss such things; but also the very real bigotry and hate that is directed in both directions for either trying to question, or accepting the historical narrative. It’s rather infuriating as it is a needed conversation that seems nearly impossible because of how much it has loaded itself and the aggressive nature in which questioning isn’t presented as sincere questioning, similar to how defending the narrative doesn’t seem to have legitimacy beyond its own defense. So frankly I can’t really comment on any of it without opening a can of worms that needs a 5 hour podcast format just to get the preliminary view to understanding the very nature of the question itself.
Published at
2025-01-26 19:07:51Event JSON
{
"id": "d318a846642539cea3e9231221ebdf8defa14602091bd848944d92b1c9b7b351",
"pubkey": "bd9eb657c25b4f6cda68871ce26259d1f9bc62420487e3224905b674a710a45a",
"created_at": 1737918471,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"28209b60fb2199bbc18dbf9bb05053e46842f4af4e8c3dddfd81313f919c859c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"fbd8a8403c25a12a17b9ce176648ef77365de62c0983a92bdebf005cc6c00047",
"wss://junxingwang.org",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"33c74427f3b2b73d5e38f3e6c991c122a55d204072356f71da49a0e209fb6940"
]
],
"content": "It’s a complex question that I resent people think can easily or sensitively discussed on forums like this because of the extremely nuanced nature of not only the conversation, content and deep historical knowledge needed to discuss such things; but also the very real bigotry and hate that is directed in both directions for either trying to question, or accepting the historical narrative. It’s rather infuriating as it is a needed conversation that seems nearly impossible because of how much it has loaded itself and the aggressive nature in which questioning isn’t presented as sincere questioning, similar to how defending the narrative doesn’t seem to have legitimacy beyond its own defense. So frankly I can’t really comment on any of it without opening a can of worms that needs a 5 hour podcast format just to get the preliminary view to understanding the very nature of the question itself. ",
"sig": "455307cebb73ea12cd54cb135d0f155e40409fef9985b0ab84deb3a06ef5d83f5eec909e0449417606da426898c73a81e21278ad8849757eea1405163f7ea7bd"
}