SLCW on Nostr: If Bitcoin was p2p, it would means transactions would require that both parties were ...
If Bitcoin was p2p, it would means transactions would require that both parties were online and active at the time of the transfer. That's not great. And it doesn't matter because the blockchain keeps churning 24x7 regardless of who's online. Wall Street "controlling" Bitcoin has nothing to do with whether it's a p2p network or not. These terms are being misused.
Published at
2024-12-05 04:48:10Event JSON
{
"id": "d316cabdaec3ce9329d1c1366de5134e25ccc6c0eec4b7fcdef60dc3dd439f06",
"pubkey": "65912a7ad17fd5cf3bacce9759f3bea3a44f9a3397340e559cf067945dc638bf",
"created_at": 1733374090,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"40b5d4d0f1da8eb3dc71e8af4490ebde2e6aec9a98ae00c3a167b1f9df4f1c4e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"113dea77c40831bf683483b83590a034089afaf584f6c845bce211817dbeada0",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"9684b9f4100e2f3f803756f9f394ed0048f5037ac675cbbb7261a90a70ff2d66"
],
[
"p",
"9c47bb510f8e732abc68518f1e88d3dfcfe2fcc624cd9427aefc759d000381d0"
]
],
"content": "If Bitcoin was p2p, it would means transactions would require that both parties were online and active at the time of the transfer. That's not great. And it doesn't matter because the blockchain keeps churning 24x7 regardless of who's online. Wall Street \"controlling\" Bitcoin has nothing to do with whether it's a p2p network or not. These terms are being misused. ",
"sig": "03cf9e424e3c2550fb97a3f9d3e1a8668c9d5884d15581cf87a17c450e6e1cc45e36e385d9b87e738417c3d7f97da8fdc1f9d87cd2a2e34872f8cd4c6403483d"
}
