ben on Nostr: Yeah sorry, rereading your original post I see you’re more interested in ...
Yeah sorry, rereading your original post I see you’re more interested in self-custodial #zaps. Unfortunately ecash ain’t it, but I think it’s an improvement over custodial lightning both for privacy and rug risk.
I could see clients running their own mints. Ecash zaps are signed to an individuals epub. Users could then periodically redeem the client ecash at another mint (one that they own or otherwise trust) or sweep into a self-custody lighting wallet. I’m not an expert here either. Lots of exciting tech coming through.
Published at
2024-04-01 23:16:51Event JSON
{
"id": "d73f0b09ea778584d5b012d9406836cabdc7ad0a1bc6363da5dcfbf3a04999ed",
"pubkey": "d4b5b685ed59f44e7bce8412caabe6b74fa5b1f4de63277e9e394989ff6c00bb",
"created_at": 1712013411,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b484a8c7e1418db76a71fbb966f963e9af48abc1939b4967d4c70020d3e37425"
],
[
"e",
"d4d3250c41b2a5c18f48e264cf3f41060fd20fa305129e81a04b431d8c8b24a4"
],
[
"p",
"fea186c2a4678dbc437704eed2160846e8a781e5fb17056e9bb333840d5bdef2"
],
[
"p",
"fea186c2a4678dbc437704eed2160846e8a781e5fb17056e9bb333840d5bdef2"
],
[
"t",
"zaps"
]
],
"content": "Yeah sorry, rereading your original post I see you’re more interested in self-custodial #zaps. Unfortunately ecash ain’t it, but I think it’s an improvement over custodial lightning both for privacy and rug risk. \n\nI could see clients running their own mints. Ecash zaps are signed to an individuals epub. Users could then periodically redeem the client ecash at another mint (one that they own or otherwise trust) or sweep into a self-custody lighting wallet. I’m not an expert here either. Lots of exciting tech coming through.",
"sig": "852df96d07f47ff1834ea7db3ddf6d95432174884d6c8038666d7fd1df2d280b09ac7458833cc9dae246eeee29120fbfffc0d52f6c4aaed897608d8613ffaeaa"
}
