HebrideanUltraTerfHecate on Nostr: Matron of the 9th circle 🤯 https://x.com/DearRebelAda/status/1888310387067523457 ...
Matron of the 9th circle (nprofile…0hzq) 🤯
https://x.com/DearRebelAda/status/1888310387067523457
I’ve worked in the NHS for 27 years. It is founded on universal ethics of equality+ beneficence. But I was contacted by a whistleblower whose experience suggests our principles are no longer fixed but are being destroyed by gender ideology, that we are at a new frontier of harm. This fight is not only about women’s rights in healthcare, but about all patients rights. “Bill” worked on a renal unit, including transplantation. Newly transplanted patients come from ITU into a sealed sideroom, to reduce risk of infection. These patients are sick and at very high risk of infection, have lines+tubes which are risky entry sites for bacteria, are in hospital where superbugs abound, on immune-suppressing drugs to prevent rejection. There can be no deviation from infection protocol, because the patient may die or lose the kidney. But Bill’s unit DOES deviate from it, in order to benefit men with gender identities, who are given siderooms straightaway, even with no clinical need for isolation. Two such men were admitted, causing two post-transplant patients to be placed on the open ward. One was okay. But the other became seriously ill with infections: her kidney failed to work, biopsies were taken, husband and son very upset. Bill said “When I walked into the ward and saw her in an open bay, on morphine, with everyone’s visitors walking in and out, I gasped out loud”.
When you have NHS professionals gasping in horror, something is very wrong. The rest of the team were very unhappy, including the surgeon and transplant coordinator. The huge investment, a precious donated kidney after years of dialysis, this woman’s life, almost thrown away. I believe they chose these suppressed patients. They could not remove infectious patients from isolation to make space for the gendered men - an outbreak would be guaranteed, catastrophic. But the suppressed patients limited risk to themselves, and a death could be explained by the known risk of infection misidentified as unavoidable: she had signed consent forms to accept risk, and the harm that was done to her is not recorded anywhere, except in the memories of the staff. The family do not know that a fitter man was given the sideroom because he said he was not a man. He had nothing to fear from a man’s ward - he was clearly a man. So, ideologues are perched even at this cutting edge of extreme illness, taking clinical decisions out of clinical hands. NHS managers, like politicians, look to appease in the most convenient way possible, just as they handed away the rights to women-only spaces, not imagining they could lose by it. In fact it could be any of them who face life-threatening complications because clinical decisions were removed from clinical hands. They say we are toxic for protesting - toxic! I spoke about this at Let Women Speak Brighton, drowned out by a jeering mob with sirens and megaphones. I have reported this hospital to the CQC. They have previous history with them, not good; but they are a Stonewall Diversity champion. Let them reflect on that. We should never allow any ideology to infiltrate our Health Service: like a parasite, it will damage and deform it to serve its own purpose, corrupt its values - this has happened. It has gone far enough - we must bring this corruption to an end, and heal.
I wrote to several relevant MPs at the time, but Parliament was about to dissolve - I only heard back from one, previously a children’s cancer nurse, who registered it with the government. I haven’t heard back from the CQC. Will chase.
https://x.com/DearRebelAda/status/1888310387067523457
I’ve worked in the NHS for 27 years. It is founded on universal ethics of equality+ beneficence. But I was contacted by a whistleblower whose experience suggests our principles are no longer fixed but are being destroyed by gender ideology, that we are at a new frontier of harm. This fight is not only about women’s rights in healthcare, but about all patients rights. “Bill” worked on a renal unit, including transplantation. Newly transplanted patients come from ITU into a sealed sideroom, to reduce risk of infection. These patients are sick and at very high risk of infection, have lines+tubes which are risky entry sites for bacteria, are in hospital where superbugs abound, on immune-suppressing drugs to prevent rejection. There can be no deviation from infection protocol, because the patient may die or lose the kidney. But Bill’s unit DOES deviate from it, in order to benefit men with gender identities, who are given siderooms straightaway, even with no clinical need for isolation. Two such men were admitted, causing two post-transplant patients to be placed on the open ward. One was okay. But the other became seriously ill with infections: her kidney failed to work, biopsies were taken, husband and son very upset. Bill said “When I walked into the ward and saw her in an open bay, on morphine, with everyone’s visitors walking in and out, I gasped out loud”.
When you have NHS professionals gasping in horror, something is very wrong. The rest of the team were very unhappy, including the surgeon and transplant coordinator. The huge investment, a precious donated kidney after years of dialysis, this woman’s life, almost thrown away. I believe they chose these suppressed patients. They could not remove infectious patients from isolation to make space for the gendered men - an outbreak would be guaranteed, catastrophic. But the suppressed patients limited risk to themselves, and a death could be explained by the known risk of infection misidentified as unavoidable: she had signed consent forms to accept risk, and the harm that was done to her is not recorded anywhere, except in the memories of the staff. The family do not know that a fitter man was given the sideroom because he said he was not a man. He had nothing to fear from a man’s ward - he was clearly a man. So, ideologues are perched even at this cutting edge of extreme illness, taking clinical decisions out of clinical hands. NHS managers, like politicians, look to appease in the most convenient way possible, just as they handed away the rights to women-only spaces, not imagining they could lose by it. In fact it could be any of them who face life-threatening complications because clinical decisions were removed from clinical hands. They say we are toxic for protesting - toxic! I spoke about this at Let Women Speak Brighton, drowned out by a jeering mob with sirens and megaphones. I have reported this hospital to the CQC. They have previous history with them, not good; but they are a Stonewall Diversity champion. Let them reflect on that. We should never allow any ideology to infiltrate our Health Service: like a parasite, it will damage and deform it to serve its own purpose, corrupt its values - this has happened. It has gone far enough - we must bring this corruption to an end, and heal.
I wrote to several relevant MPs at the time, but Parliament was about to dissolve - I only heard back from one, previously a children’s cancer nurse, who registered it with the government. I haven’t heard back from the CQC. Will chase.