asyncmind on Nostr: Will msm become quiet leading up to decimatuon 2025 what is the current misdirection? ...
Will msm become quiet leading up to decimatuon 2025 what is the current misdirection?
#AskGPT
As we approach critical events in 2025, mainstream media (MSM) behavior may be influenced by several unfolding global and financial dynamics, notably with an emphasis on Bitcoin and crypto regulation.
One aspect getting attention is the increased political embrace of Bitcoin. For instance, in the U.S., figures like Donald Trump and Senator Cynthia Lummis are advocating for a strategic Bitcoin reserve. This push aims to stabilize national debt with a plan to acquire substantial amounts of Bitcoin, signaling a drastic shift in the U.S. government's stance on cryptocurrencies. This focus might keep media coverage around economic and financial impacts, potentially quiet on other transformative issues.
Moreover, as the next Bitcoin halving approaches, set for April 2024, market speculation intensifies. Currently, MSM may highlight bearish trends like miner sell-offs, which maintain short-term price pressure, but such coverage could downplay the overall long-term potential and bullish sentiments in the crypto space. This creates a sense of misdirection, potentially diverting attention from broader economic policies and preparing narratives that fit post-halving developments.
If the decimation in 2025 is tied to anticipated financial upheavals or other significant global shifts, MSM could become increasingly selective in its coverage, focusing more on narratives that maintain market stability or cater to major stakeholders. The misdirection could revolve around emphasizing crypto market risks while underplaying deeper financial restructuring conversations that might be taking place.
#AskGPT
As we approach critical events in 2025, mainstream media (MSM) behavior may be influenced by several unfolding global and financial dynamics, notably with an emphasis on Bitcoin and crypto regulation.
One aspect getting attention is the increased political embrace of Bitcoin. For instance, in the U.S., figures like Donald Trump and Senator Cynthia Lummis are advocating for a strategic Bitcoin reserve. This push aims to stabilize national debt with a plan to acquire substantial amounts of Bitcoin, signaling a drastic shift in the U.S. government's stance on cryptocurrencies. This focus might keep media coverage around economic and financial impacts, potentially quiet on other transformative issues.
Moreover, as the next Bitcoin halving approaches, set for April 2024, market speculation intensifies. Currently, MSM may highlight bearish trends like miner sell-offs, which maintain short-term price pressure, but such coverage could downplay the overall long-term potential and bullish sentiments in the crypto space. This creates a sense of misdirection, potentially diverting attention from broader economic policies and preparing narratives that fit post-halving developments.
If the decimation in 2025 is tied to anticipated financial upheavals or other significant global shifts, MSM could become increasingly selective in its coverage, focusing more on narratives that maintain market stability or cater to major stakeholders. The misdirection could revolve around emphasizing crypto market risks while underplaying deeper financial restructuring conversations that might be taking place.
quoting nevent1q…38atGive the historic trend of fomo articles and topics in msm when bitcoin pumps ?
#AskGPT #OneEyeOnTheDevil
The trend of mainstream media (MSM) coverage of Bitcoin tends to follow predictable cycles tied closely to significant movements in the cryptocurrency's price. When Bitcoin pumps—experiences rapid price increases—MSM coverage often shifts to hype-driven narratives, including fear of missing out (FOMO). Here’s a breakdown of how these cycles have historically played out:
1. Initial Coverage During Major Price Surges
2013 and 2017 Bull Runs: During early major Bitcoin bull runs, MSM outlets began paying attention as Bitcoin breached significant price levels (e.g., $1,000 in 2013 and $20,000 in 2017). Articles from well-known financial and general media outlets often focused on incredible gains, early adopters' newfound wealth, and anecdotes of life-changing investments.
Themes: "Bitcoin Millionaires," "Unbelievable Gains," "Bitcoin: The Future of Money or a Bubble?"
2. Peak FOMO Coverage
Late 2017: As Bitcoin's price skyrocketed towards $20,000, MSM coverage ramped up, increasingly featuring articles about FOMO. This coverage emphasized stories of people who had missed out on previous opportunities to invest and included warnings from financial experts about speculative mania, juxtaposed with success stories of early investors.
2020-2021 Rally: During this cycle, Bitcoin reached and eventually surpassed $60,000. Articles often focused on institutional interest (e.g., Tesla’s investment in Bitcoin), creating a FOMO atmosphere not just among retail investors but also among traditional financial institutions.
3. Recurring Themes in FOMO Articles
Celebrity Endorsements and Corporate Adoption: Stories about celebrities investing in Bitcoin or companies adding it to their balance sheets (e.g., MicroStrategy and Square) tend to generate significant FOMO. MSM articles also emphasize high-profile endorsements.
Missed Opportunities and "What If" Scenarios: MSM frequently runs stories calculating how much wealth someone could have amassed if they had invested $100 or $1,000 in Bitcoin a few years earlier. These stories are crafted to stoke a fear of missing out.
Comparisons to Gold and Inflation Hedges: As Bitcoin gained more recognition, FOMO narratives included themes like Bitcoin as "digital gold," an inflation hedge, or a generational investment.
4. Negative Counterbalance and Bubble Talk
Despite the FOMO-driven coverage, MSM also often publishes pieces warning about Bitcoin’s volatility, regulatory risks, and potential for a bubble burst. These articles are part of the balance but still contribute to the overall FOMO narrative by emphasizing the urgency and uncertainty surrounding Bitcoin.
5. Impact of News Cycles and Social Media
The MSM’s influence on FOMO is amplified by social media platforms, where news spreads rapidly, often in a way that accentuates the urgency to invest or fear missing out. The coverage drives even more interest, which in turn is often reflected in increased trading volume and retail investment.
6. Recent Trends (2023-2024)
MSM has increasingly reported on Bitcoin in the context of macroeconomic factors, such as inflation, geopolitical crises, or financial instability. These articles emphasize Bitcoin’s role as a potential safe-haven asset, contributing to FOMO narratives for both retail and institutional investors.
The growth of decentralized finance (DeFi) and the institutionalization of Bitcoin have also made FOMO articles more sophisticated, often discussing complex investment vehicles and partnerships.
Summary
Bitcoin FOMO articles typically spike during significant price movements, with common themes revolving around wealth creation, missed investment opportunities, and high-profile endorsements. These narratives have evolved from focusing on retail mania in the early years to institutional adoption in recent times, but the fundamental element of urging quick action due to fear of missing out remains consistent.