FruitSaladMike on Nostr: >Blabber. You have proof, did you verify that? or TV told you? again, TV doesn't tell ...
>Blabber. You have proof, did you verify that? or TV told you?
again, TV doesn't tell me shit cause I ain't watching. I like to read. And yes, I also read things that are way out of my world view.
So, of course I haven't seen a sheep fucking a lamb. But I also never have see a bear in the wild, does that mean they only exist in Zoos? Or do I believe the witnesses that did and then combine it with the knowledge that all Zoo animals have to come from somewhere.
Would you believe it if you see the lamb suffering? Would you believe in a virus that you can see under a microscope with your own eyes?
>Projecting and ad lapidem. You believe it and have no arguments.
Do I really need to present you a link to a source? I'm sure you know most of them but reject them. Do you want links to the Nature magazine?
>How do the toxins know who is the jew and who isn't? Do they ask you before? Do they check your genealogy? That doesn't make sense!
>What? You clearly didn't read it like any virlogy study either.
I was referring to your chemotherapy claim.
>You understand everything? Where did you learn all that?
>I admit that I did not study biology or medicine.
That's not a problem. I'm in a very different field as well.
>Of course not. You learn a lot in 3 years when someone tries to torture you not allow you to enter shop to buy food for filthy shekels and inject poisons into you. Knowledge is power. I can assure you doctors don't even read those studies.
We all went through this.
Most doctors don't read those studies cause you have to dig deep to find them. As your link tree showed there was two main stream media articles on the inaccuracies of DNA samples (Yes, I actually look at the texts you send. I don't click on images tho.). That's how science works, you create a theory and then work your way along it for the proof. In some cases you reach a dead end (string theory 😆 sorry dear physicists). In other cases you confirm it but also show the limits of the real life value.
>You went to school didn't you? You must know how it goes their. Do students question what teacher preaches or is that a taboo and such student would be mocked and pushed out of collective? That's not education that is indoctrination. Repetition doesn't require inteligence. Good recommended https://liberdon.com/users/akeno/statuses/107354339566570479 This only requires basic logic and analitical and critical thinking. It's science. If it's not verifiable and reproducible it's fraud.... and I don't spend time on being distracted by agenda against my own biology.
Yes, I went to school. Yes, I was mocked and not part of the collective (even before my coming out). I had teachers that welcomed critical thinking and teachers that kicked me out of class for it.
There are two kinds of logic, formal and informal. I like to think that I am decent on formal logic, that might explain some shortcomings on the informal logic.
>You assume it, have no arguments, no proof, and at this point you ignore the criticism of virology that exists since it's inception.
I looked at the criticism (see one of my earlier comments). It's exactly what you call it, criticism, no proof.
>looking forward.
😆 I bet you do, but it might take a few years. Right now I really enjoy my no fuss hairstyle.
>A bit too easy, I asked about radiation and you answered with a virus.
> "Cancers" are widespread thanks to vaccines and Bigpharma, correlation doesn't imply causation in science, only in religion.
Since when do wild animals get vaccines? Cancer isn't just a human problem.
>Well IDK how that works but hearing kindle Iassume paid crap. I just wanted to point out that only a jew cashes shekels on digital copies of MK.
Everything Hitler had, he left in his testament to the Party and copyright is the Volk.
Of course you pay for the device and the books, but you can also send free ebooks to it. I just love it because of its portability. And if you go on holiday you don't want to take heavy books with, or at least I don't want. Imo one of the best inventions for people who read a lot.
again, TV doesn't tell me shit cause I ain't watching. I like to read. And yes, I also read things that are way out of my world view.
So, of course I haven't seen a sheep fucking a lamb. But I also never have see a bear in the wild, does that mean they only exist in Zoos? Or do I believe the witnesses that did and then combine it with the knowledge that all Zoo animals have to come from somewhere.
Would you believe it if you see the lamb suffering? Would you believe in a virus that you can see under a microscope with your own eyes?
>Projecting and ad lapidem. You believe it and have no arguments.
Do I really need to present you a link to a source? I'm sure you know most of them but reject them. Do you want links to the Nature magazine?
>How do the toxins know who is the jew and who isn't? Do they ask you before? Do they check your genealogy? That doesn't make sense!
>What? You clearly didn't read it like any virlogy study either.
I was referring to your chemotherapy claim.
>You understand everything? Where did you learn all that?
>I admit that I did not study biology or medicine.
That's not a problem. I'm in a very different field as well.
>Of course not. You learn a lot in 3 years when someone tries to torture you not allow you to enter shop to buy food for filthy shekels and inject poisons into you. Knowledge is power. I can assure you doctors don't even read those studies.
We all went through this.
Most doctors don't read those studies cause you have to dig deep to find them. As your link tree showed there was two main stream media articles on the inaccuracies of DNA samples (Yes, I actually look at the texts you send. I don't click on images tho.). That's how science works, you create a theory and then work your way along it for the proof. In some cases you reach a dead end (string theory 😆 sorry dear physicists). In other cases you confirm it but also show the limits of the real life value.
>You went to school didn't you? You must know how it goes their. Do students question what teacher preaches or is that a taboo and such student would be mocked and pushed out of collective? That's not education that is indoctrination. Repetition doesn't require inteligence. Good recommended https://liberdon.com/users/akeno/statuses/107354339566570479 This only requires basic logic and analitical and critical thinking. It's science. If it's not verifiable and reproducible it's fraud.... and I don't spend time on being distracted by agenda against my own biology.
Yes, I went to school. Yes, I was mocked and not part of the collective (even before my coming out). I had teachers that welcomed critical thinking and teachers that kicked me out of class for it.
There are two kinds of logic, formal and informal. I like to think that I am decent on formal logic, that might explain some shortcomings on the informal logic.
>You assume it, have no arguments, no proof, and at this point you ignore the criticism of virology that exists since it's inception.
I looked at the criticism (see one of my earlier comments). It's exactly what you call it, criticism, no proof.
>looking forward.
😆 I bet you do, but it might take a few years. Right now I really enjoy my no fuss hairstyle.
>A bit too easy, I asked about radiation and you answered with a virus.
> "Cancers" are widespread thanks to vaccines and Bigpharma, correlation doesn't imply causation in science, only in religion.
Since when do wild animals get vaccines? Cancer isn't just a human problem.
>Well IDK how that works but hearing kindle Iassume paid crap. I just wanted to point out that only a jew cashes shekels on digital copies of MK.
Everything Hitler had, he left in his testament to the Party and copyright is the Volk.
Of course you pay for the device and the books, but you can also send free ebooks to it. I just love it because of its portability. And if you go on holiday you don't want to take heavy books with, or at least I don't want. Imo one of the best inventions for people who read a lot.