Rodney Morris [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2017-03-31 š Original message:You guessed wrong. ...
š
Original date posted:2017-03-31
š Original message:You guessed wrong. Multiple data centres are as much about redundancy and
resiliency, and latency.
As for the cost, data centre space, business grade communication lines, and
staff are orders of magnitude more expensive than the physical hardware
they support.
I'd like to call you out on your continuing reduction to absurdity and
slippery slope arguments. Just because we can't handle 4GB blocks today,
doesn't mean we shouldn't aim in that direction. Doesn't mean we shouldn't
be taking our first second and third baby steps in that direction.
If the obsession with every personal computer being able to run a fill node
continues then bitcoin will be consigned to the dustbin of history, a
footnote to the story of the global crypto currency that eventually took
over the world.
Thanks
Rodney
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:14:42 -0400
From: David Vorick <david.vorick at gmail.com>
To: Jared Lee Richardson <jaredr26 at gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hard fork proposal from last week's meeting
Message-ID:
<CAFVRnyqSMVj2Ttc4_5vuk73Z5yRJdxeSodvkdjqsrHbgghcmUQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Then explain why PayPal has multiple datacenters. And why Visa has multiple
datacenters. And why the banking systems have multiple datacenters each.
I'm guessing it's because you need that much juice to run a global payment
system at the transaction volumes that they run at.
Unless you have professional experience working directly with transaction
processors handling tens of millions of financial transactions per day, I
think we can fully discount your assessment that it would be a rounding
error in the budget of a major exchange or Bitcoin processor to handle that
much load. And even if it was, it wouldn't matter because it's extremely
important to Bitcoin's security that it's everyday users are able to and
are actively running full nodes.
I'm not going to take the time to refute everything you've been saying but
I will say that most of your comments have demonstrated a similar level of
ignorance as the one above.
This whole thread has been absurdly low quality.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170401/54de6975/attachment-0001.html>;
š Original message:You guessed wrong. Multiple data centres are as much about redundancy and
resiliency, and latency.
As for the cost, data centre space, business grade communication lines, and
staff are orders of magnitude more expensive than the physical hardware
they support.
I'd like to call you out on your continuing reduction to absurdity and
slippery slope arguments. Just because we can't handle 4GB blocks today,
doesn't mean we shouldn't aim in that direction. Doesn't mean we shouldn't
be taking our first second and third baby steps in that direction.
If the obsession with every personal computer being able to run a fill node
continues then bitcoin will be consigned to the dustbin of history, a
footnote to the story of the global crypto currency that eventually took
over the world.
Thanks
Rodney
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:14:42 -0400
From: David Vorick <david.vorick at gmail.com>
To: Jared Lee Richardson <jaredr26 at gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hard fork proposal from last week's meeting
Message-ID:
<CAFVRnyqSMVj2Ttc4_5vuk73Z5yRJdxeSodvkdjqsrHbgghcmUQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Then explain why PayPal has multiple datacenters. And why Visa has multiple
datacenters. And why the banking systems have multiple datacenters each.
I'm guessing it's because you need that much juice to run a global payment
system at the transaction volumes that they run at.
Unless you have professional experience working directly with transaction
processors handling tens of millions of financial transactions per day, I
think we can fully discount your assessment that it would be a rounding
error in the budget of a major exchange or Bitcoin processor to handle that
much load. And even if it was, it wouldn't matter because it's extremely
important to Bitcoin's security that it's everyday users are able to and
are actively running full nodes.
I'm not going to take the time to refute everything you've been saying but
I will say that most of your comments have demonstrated a similar level of
ignorance as the one above.
This whole thread has been absurdly low quality.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170401/54de6975/attachment-0001.html>;