Luke-Jr [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-01-20 📝 Original message:On Monday, January 20, ...
📅 Original date posted:2014-01-20
📝 Original message:On Monday, January 20, 2014 5:42:37 PM slush wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> during recent months we've reconsidered all comments which we received from
> the community about our BIP39 proposal and we tried to meet all
> requirements for such standard. Specifically the proposal now doesn't
> require any specific wordlist, so every client can use its very own list of
> preferred words. Generated mnemonic can be then applied to any other
> BIP39-compatible client. Please follow current draft at
> https://github.com/trezor/bips/blob/master/bip-0039.mediawiki.
How are they compatible if they could be using entirely different word lists??
> Because we're quickly moving towards release of Trezor firmware and we need
> to finalize this part of the firmware, we're asking for the last comments
> to current BIP39 draft.
Maybe I'm missing something, but shouldn't this be a client-side thing, not
implemented in the Trezor firmware at all?? O.o;;
Luke
📝 Original message:On Monday, January 20, 2014 5:42:37 PM slush wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> during recent months we've reconsidered all comments which we received from
> the community about our BIP39 proposal and we tried to meet all
> requirements for such standard. Specifically the proposal now doesn't
> require any specific wordlist, so every client can use its very own list of
> preferred words. Generated mnemonic can be then applied to any other
> BIP39-compatible client. Please follow current draft at
> https://github.com/trezor/bips/blob/master/bip-0039.mediawiki.
How are they compatible if they could be using entirely different word lists??
> Because we're quickly moving towards release of Trezor firmware and we need
> to finalize this part of the firmware, we're asking for the last comments
> to current BIP39 draft.
Maybe I'm missing something, but shouldn't this be a client-side thing, not
implemented in the Trezor firmware at all?? O.o;;
Luke