AnungIkwe ᐊᓈᓐg ᐃᑴ on Nostr: DAVID HAYTONS BOOK IS SHIT! "I have a LOT to say about this book. I want to ...
DAVID HAYTONS BOOK IS SHIT!
"I have a LOT to say about this book. I want to particularly cover the downplaying of paraphilia, arguments that would effectively compromise women’s rights, and how the book promotes ‘transition’ 🧵
One of my first thoughts was that the title proclaims a journey back to reality and yet, several paragraphs into the prologue the word “neoclitoris” is used.
The author does describe the harms, and risks, of genital surgery. You might think that’s great, but let’s put a pin in that, for now.
He claims that by the age of three he was ashamed of thinking about girls tights. For those of us rightly dismissive of the concept of the trans child, the concept of the AGP child is similarly unacceptable.
In this case because it projects a paraphilia onto a child.
Yet this is where he is going.
The author says he stole his mother's tights from the rubbish bin. He claims it was exciting, made his heart race and his body “would become aroused”
At just 5 years old.
He talks about dressing up as a ladybird for the village fete, being full of adrenaline, and wishing he could keep the tights to wear privately. At 6 years old.
Why is any adult suggesting that 6 year olds are being driven by a paraphilia? It's insane. But then the word paraphilia is never mentioned in the main text of this book. He doesn’t want people to consider it that.
The AGP child, like the trans child, then, is cover.
He says of his childhood experiences that “my internal struggles might have been sexual- they clearly related to my sex- but they were not erotic” 🫥
He then describes autogynephilia as a psychological condition.
Once he was a teenager, and beyond, he says it became explicitly sexual & he started buying women’s clothes for the purpose “although my immediate physical needs were satisfied with my bag of clothing-always strictly alone- human beings are social animals. We need relationships…”
When he meets his wife, his paraphilia seems to recede temporarily
“I no longer wanted to be a girl… I had a girl”
A few pages later he says
“It wasn't women’s clothes that captivated me, I wanted a female body”
Those two statements considered, side by side, upset me.
Soon after returning from honeymoon he wants to take this further by ‘transitioning’ & it’s clear over multiple pages that this sexual behaviour is a huge focus for him & is already threatening to take over his whole life.
He tells a member of the pastoral team about his crossdressing and they agree, together, that neither transsexualism, or tranvestism, are things men should be doing, then the author asked if there was an option for
“conversion therapy?”
Thereby conflating cruel measures designed to stop someone from being gay, with interventions that might stop a man compulsively devoting his life to his paraphilia.
Given the GC position is that including ‘trans’ people in conversion therapy bills would be dangerous because it limits exploratory options, and conflates wildly different things, this is notable.
He talks about his “cravings to change sex”
I think cravings is SUCH an interesting word.
Some men have all sorts of harmful sexual cravings, don't they?
He calls it a compulsion, too. As though it is something near impossible to resist.
Calling harmful behaviours a compulsion seems like an attempt to minimise responsibility for the sexual damage a man is inflicting, whether on himself, or others. The subtext, in the word, is that he cannot help it.
It’s also true that if we really believe a man is so compelled to sexual destruction that he cannot resist it, he is not a rational actor and we should not treat him as such.
The author is soon hiding clothes in his house and spends time on the internet looking at forums for other men like him
He paints a very clear picture of a man who is letting himself be consumed by these desires & further reinforcing them by linking them to his sexual gratification"
Lorelei 🌕🧙🏻♀️🕸🍄 npub19n89lwyxs30qa9zqheffxqv46m0u3y4lxmvnf5lznkqa23tjq7jszt3tkc (npub19n8…3tkc)
https://twitter.com/hatpinwoman/status/1755650643446939933
#FreeSpeech #LetWomenSpeak #GCUltra
#YWNBAW #WomanFace #NotYourFetish #GenderBlackFace #NotYourCostume #AGP #Autogynephile #Autogynephilia #PeakTrans #TransCult #GenderAtheist #GenderWooWoo #DropTheT #GetTheLOut #SexIsNotACostume #WomenDontHavePenises #KeepWomensSpacesSingleSex #SexNotGender #SexMatters #AntiKink #AbolishSissyHypnoPorn
"I have a LOT to say about this book. I want to particularly cover the downplaying of paraphilia, arguments that would effectively compromise women’s rights, and how the book promotes ‘transition’ 🧵
One of my first thoughts was that the title proclaims a journey back to reality and yet, several paragraphs into the prologue the word “neoclitoris” is used.
The author does describe the harms, and risks, of genital surgery. You might think that’s great, but let’s put a pin in that, for now.
He claims that by the age of three he was ashamed of thinking about girls tights. For those of us rightly dismissive of the concept of the trans child, the concept of the AGP child is similarly unacceptable.
In this case because it projects a paraphilia onto a child.
Yet this is where he is going.
The author says he stole his mother's tights from the rubbish bin. He claims it was exciting, made his heart race and his body “would become aroused”
At just 5 years old.
He talks about dressing up as a ladybird for the village fete, being full of adrenaline, and wishing he could keep the tights to wear privately. At 6 years old.
Why is any adult suggesting that 6 year olds are being driven by a paraphilia? It's insane. But then the word paraphilia is never mentioned in the main text of this book. He doesn’t want people to consider it that.
The AGP child, like the trans child, then, is cover.
He says of his childhood experiences that “my internal struggles might have been sexual- they clearly related to my sex- but they were not erotic” 🫥
He then describes autogynephilia as a psychological condition.
Once he was a teenager, and beyond, he says it became explicitly sexual & he started buying women’s clothes for the purpose “although my immediate physical needs were satisfied with my bag of clothing-always strictly alone- human beings are social animals. We need relationships…”
When he meets his wife, his paraphilia seems to recede temporarily
“I no longer wanted to be a girl… I had a girl”
A few pages later he says
“It wasn't women’s clothes that captivated me, I wanted a female body”
Those two statements considered, side by side, upset me.
Soon after returning from honeymoon he wants to take this further by ‘transitioning’ & it’s clear over multiple pages that this sexual behaviour is a huge focus for him & is already threatening to take over his whole life.
He tells a member of the pastoral team about his crossdressing and they agree, together, that neither transsexualism, or tranvestism, are things men should be doing, then the author asked if there was an option for
“conversion therapy?”
Thereby conflating cruel measures designed to stop someone from being gay, with interventions that might stop a man compulsively devoting his life to his paraphilia.
Given the GC position is that including ‘trans’ people in conversion therapy bills would be dangerous because it limits exploratory options, and conflates wildly different things, this is notable.
He talks about his “cravings to change sex”
I think cravings is SUCH an interesting word.
Some men have all sorts of harmful sexual cravings, don't they?
He calls it a compulsion, too. As though it is something near impossible to resist.
Calling harmful behaviours a compulsion seems like an attempt to minimise responsibility for the sexual damage a man is inflicting, whether on himself, or others. The subtext, in the word, is that he cannot help it.
It’s also true that if we really believe a man is so compelled to sexual destruction that he cannot resist it, he is not a rational actor and we should not treat him as such.
The author is soon hiding clothes in his house and spends time on the internet looking at forums for other men like him
He paints a very clear picture of a man who is letting himself be consumed by these desires & further reinforcing them by linking them to his sexual gratification"
Lorelei 🌕🧙🏻♀️🕸🍄 npub19n89lwyxs30qa9zqheffxqv46m0u3y4lxmvnf5lznkqa23tjq7jszt3tkc (npub19n8…3tkc)
https://twitter.com/hatpinwoman/status/1755650643446939933
#FreeSpeech #LetWomenSpeak #GCUltra
#YWNBAW #WomanFace #NotYourFetish #GenderBlackFace #NotYourCostume #AGP #Autogynephile #Autogynephilia #PeakTrans #TransCult #GenderAtheist #GenderWooWoo #DropTheT #GetTheLOut #SexIsNotACostume #WomenDontHavePenises #KeepWomensSpacesSingleSex #SexNotGender #SexMatters #AntiKink #AbolishSissyHypnoPorn