ZmnSCPxj [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2018-11-02 📝 Original message: Good morning Rusty, aj, ...
📅 Original date posted:2018-11-02
📝 Original message:
Good morning Rusty, aj, and list,
> > - channel announcements: do you support secp256k1 for hashes or just
> > sha256?
> >
>
> Worse, it becomes "I support secp256k1 with ECDSA" then a new "I support
> secp256k1 with Schnorr". You need a continuous path of channels with
> the same feature.
>
I believe not? Both the 2p-ECDSA and Schnorr contingent payment schemes effectively encode "I will pay you N satoshi if you give me the private key of the public key P on the secp256k1 curve, before time B", which can be composed with another contingent payment of either 2p-ECDSA or Schnorr. So it would be possible to have a route with channels alternating between the two schemes.
Or do I misunderstand some detail?
Regards,
ZmnSCPxj
📝 Original message:
Good morning Rusty, aj, and list,
> > - channel announcements: do you support secp256k1 for hashes or just
> > sha256?
> >
>
> Worse, it becomes "I support secp256k1 with ECDSA" then a new "I support
> secp256k1 with Schnorr". You need a continuous path of channels with
> the same feature.
>
I believe not? Both the 2p-ECDSA and Schnorr contingent payment schemes effectively encode "I will pay you N satoshi if you give me the private key of the public key P on the secp256k1 curve, before time B", which can be composed with another contingent payment of either 2p-ECDSA or Schnorr. So it would be possible to have a route with channels alternating between the two schemes.
Or do I misunderstand some detail?
Regards,
ZmnSCPxj