Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2011-12-18 🗒️ Summary of this message: Simple URI ...
📅 Original date posted:2011-12-18
🗒️ Summary of this message: Simple URI proposal allows integration of Namecoin to map server IP without certificates. Users can choose between HTTP, HTTPS, Namecoin or other trusted options. Valid format of response message should be discussed.
📝 Original message:If we chose the simple URI proposal namecoin can still be integrated
to map the IP of the server by those who want to.
Does it removes the necessity of the certificates?
If so, we should let people decide between HTTP, HTTPS, namecoin or
whatever they trust.
Shouldn't we be also discussing the valid format of the answered
message? I mean fields like "amount", "concept" and such.
🗒️ Summary of this message: Simple URI proposal allows integration of Namecoin to map server IP without certificates. Users can choose between HTTP, HTTPS, Namecoin or other trusted options. Valid format of response message should be discussed.
📝 Original message:If we chose the simple URI proposal namecoin can still be integrated
to map the IP of the server by those who want to.
Does it removes the necessity of the certificates?
If so, we should let people decide between HTTP, HTTPS, namecoin or
whatever they trust.
Shouldn't we be also discussing the valid format of the answered
message? I mean fields like "amount", "concept" and such.