mleku on Nostr: the dinosaurs that we found were rare not because they are old but because it is ...
the dinosaurs that we found were rare not because they are old but because it is unusual circumstances where so much water and mud piles up so fast the dead bodies have no time to decay before being encased in oxygen-free sedimentary rock
because what drowned them was so much water that it could only have been the actual ocean being washed over the land because the entire crust of the earth slipped into a new position
it's funny because i've seen a christian archaeology doco that talks about the fact that the preservation would have to have happened from a massive amount of water washing soil around, but they don't consider that the phenomenon of crustal slip could cause it (pole shift)
in fact, it is vaguely possible that a meteor strike of a large number of them hitting the pacific ocean, for example, could cause such flooding in a more localised area but a pole shift gives you the whole planet being mostly washed away, and the actual rain involved? that's because a pole shift is caused by a change in the magnetic fields around our solar system emanating from the galactic centre where the greatest nearby, magnetically aligned, rotating mass is... when two magnetic fields come into conflict at 90` the result is nullification of the magnetic field, and with no magnetic field the earth is flooded with space energy from stars, and plasma and high energy particles, which would fill the atmosphere with electric charge, which stimulates cloud formation
this is all pretty much done and dusted science at this point, but not the narrative they want us to believe
the whole dinosaurs thing is part of the lie about carbon fuels coming from dead animals and plants buried under the dust of a single large comet strike, or so we are supposed to believe
could be but why are they found all across the planet if it was just from a comet strike, surely one half of the planet would be thinly distributed... it takes a LOT of water to wash multi-tonne animals under the mud fast enough that they don't rot away before they are sealed up
because what drowned them was so much water that it could only have been the actual ocean being washed over the land because the entire crust of the earth slipped into a new position
it's funny because i've seen a christian archaeology doco that talks about the fact that the preservation would have to have happened from a massive amount of water washing soil around, but they don't consider that the phenomenon of crustal slip could cause it (pole shift)
in fact, it is vaguely possible that a meteor strike of a large number of them hitting the pacific ocean, for example, could cause such flooding in a more localised area but a pole shift gives you the whole planet being mostly washed away, and the actual rain involved? that's because a pole shift is caused by a change in the magnetic fields around our solar system emanating from the galactic centre where the greatest nearby, magnetically aligned, rotating mass is... when two magnetic fields come into conflict at 90` the result is nullification of the magnetic field, and with no magnetic field the earth is flooded with space energy from stars, and plasma and high energy particles, which would fill the atmosphere with electric charge, which stimulates cloud formation
this is all pretty much done and dusted science at this point, but not the narrative they want us to believe
the whole dinosaurs thing is part of the lie about carbon fuels coming from dead animals and plants buried under the dust of a single large comet strike, or so we are supposed to believe
could be but why are they found all across the planet if it was just from a comet strike, surely one half of the planet would be thinly distributed... it takes a LOT of water to wash multi-tonne animals under the mud fast enough that they don't rot away before they are sealed up