Event JSON
{
"id": "d93fc3c053092c264c871b6ad3f25b610b39f906e81e1d6d8418b912fedaa84e",
"pubkey": "c787b0248adec73bf7049a9f81f9916de768e612bb1dd3e2b50c38f7a13831df",
"created_at": 1717625878,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"bf3cb02ae89b36e9429420810953c017f3dc4f99b5f0e6c8c714b488edb83c52",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"52c26401aa75398b8a68f53a0e78b401f10b4449919f5dbf3ecd00c0e05ff020",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"f5676b30a5275f4d4452ea25f10de9dfd5f0613975610d5887887de442005443",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://photog.social/users/tomnorthfilm/statuses/112566329546748407",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1hu7tq2hgnvmwjs55yzqsj57qzleacnuekhcwdjx8zj6g3mdc83fqht4g0d That’s my assumption as well. I’m not surprised that a 90 year old uncoated lens would have less contrast. It as we know, that can be fixed in the darkroom or in post.",
"sig": "2f53b5af9a8a63424ee06f996cb083722d3a2c743ca11267b8a210621653af58a71be82f4c8f0f0cd1a44790dfb97fd0c6fd565f52ee6f769d046efe8dd7457a"
}