hzrd149 on Nostr: new or old 🤔 - it is 🤔 always important to ask questions. as they say verify ...
new or old 🤔 - it is 🤔 always important to ask questions. as they say verify don't trust. particularly with something new. learning how something works and why 👍 is 🌈 part of 👍 the process. 🎉 in time the questions will 🤔 change 🎉 as understanding improves. for me it is question messaging and actions. currently 😀 the messaging doesn't match the 🌈 actions. the talk of ossification reinforces this. 💯 money go up 🎉 was not the purpose 👍 of btc. it's value is as 💯 peer to peer medium of exchange ( no 🎉 middle men). as the network grows 😂 so will the value. storing 💯 btc and stagnating the network with coins that don't move 🤔 .... is 😂 like having a computer that is slower 🌈 than your brain. zero 🤔 value. or cold 👍 storage with 0s and 1s. if the reason the btc network is 💯 stagnating is the size of the blocks restricting the 💯 number of 👍 transactions, why not increase the 😀 block 😀 size? 😂 node ownership? 🌈 is 💯 that really an argument? 🌈 we have no idea how 😀 credit cards 💯 work but thousands use them. privacy? chainanalysis would appear to undo that argument. supporting the network? really? domestic tinkerers vs network trained staff across thousands of 😀 businesses worldwide? the network will survive 👍 and thrive with usage of 🤔 network with spv as designed. think email. block size was unlimited by design. the 🔥 restriction 😂 was an early stage protection against denial 💯 of service 'dos' attack 😂 on an infant 😂 network. 🤔 that needs seems considerably reduced judging by network 🌈 size today. 🎉 so why 😀 do we still need 👍 small blocks? lightning 😂 network - redesigning the wheel. 😀 spv 👍 already serves 😀 that need. bitcoin cash still uses 🎉 it. looking to the future and big fees, slow transactions on-chain - what happens 🎉 when millions of 😂 lightning users need 💯 to do on-chain transactions too? pay the ransom or 🎉 bottleneck? as i said - message and actions. they don't marry. we are all being told 🌈 a million reasons, that it is essential to run small blocks but 💯 nobody is asking the question why? The btc design 🎉 allows for unlimited blocks 🎉 - why not let 🤔 the 💯 free 🌈 market decide what 😀 size blocks 🌈 are best? ignoring market needs is never good for a business. it is not boding well for btc 🔥 either 💯 despite all the hype and money 😀 go up. 🔥 seems a reasonable question? let's have a discussion 🔥 on block 🎉 sizes 🌈 and get 😂 some real 😂 feedback on big 🎉 vs small and 🎉 let the chips lay 🌈 where they land. should btc return to being an moe, i 😂 suspect the true 🔥 value will return. here's hoping. GM 🙃
Published at
2024-09-22 11:41:17Event JSON
{
"id": "db896ccebe1dcd1aa76a020fa93e88fdfac083595344971f7389697aaaf2ec59",
"pubkey": "b0262dea22472e3056d9be099cace2822f5234e05648b891cc7254ce965bc389",
"created_at": 1727005277,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"50460d2fc8780b7c22e24f41b58cd9056c0830c57bac24a562841aa4b2b9af94"
],
[
"p",
"9cb3545c36940d9a2ef86d50d5c7a8fab90310cc898c4344bcfc4c822ff47bca"
]
],
"content": "new or old 🤔 - it is 🤔 always important to ask questions. as they say verify don't trust. particularly with something new. learning how something works and why 👍 is 🌈 part of 👍 the process. 🎉 in time the questions will 🤔 change 🎉 as understanding improves. for me it is question messaging and actions. currently 😀 the messaging doesn't match the 🌈 actions. the talk of ossification reinforces this. 💯 money go up 🎉 was not the purpose 👍 of btc. it's value is as 💯 peer to peer medium of exchange ( no 🎉 middle men). as the network grows 😂 so will the value. storing 💯 btc and stagnating the network with coins that don't move 🤔 .... is 😂 like having a computer that is slower 🌈 than your brain. zero 🤔 value. or cold 👍 storage with 0s and 1s. if the reason the btc network is 💯 stagnating is the size of the blocks restricting the 💯 number of 👍 transactions, why not increase the 😀 block 😀 size? 😂 node ownership? 🌈 is 💯 that really an argument? 🌈 we have no idea how 😀 credit cards 💯 work but thousands use them. privacy? chainanalysis would appear to undo that argument. supporting the network? really? domestic tinkerers vs network trained staff across thousands of 😀 businesses worldwide? the network will survive 👍 and thrive with usage of 🤔 network with spv as designed. think email. block size was unlimited by design. the 🔥 restriction 😂 was an early stage protection against denial 💯 of service 'dos' attack 😂 on an infant 😂 network. 🤔 that needs seems considerably reduced judging by network 🌈 size today. 🎉 so why 😀 do we still need 👍 small blocks? lightning 😂 network - redesigning the wheel. 😀 spv 👍 already serves 😀 that need. bitcoin cash still uses 🎉 it. looking to the future and big fees, slow transactions on-chain - what happens 🎉 when millions of 😂 lightning users need 💯 to do on-chain transactions too? pay the ransom or 🎉 bottleneck? as i said - message and actions. they don't marry. we are all being told 🌈 a million reasons, that it is essential to run small blocks but 💯 nobody is asking the question why? The btc design 🎉 allows for unlimited blocks 🎉 - why not let 🤔 the 💯 free 🌈 market decide what 😀 size blocks 🌈 are best? ignoring market needs is never good for a business. it is not boding well for btc 🔥 either 💯 despite all the hype and money 😀 go up. 🔥 seems a reasonable question? let's have a discussion 🔥 on block 🎉 sizes 🌈 and get 😂 some real 😂 feedback on big 🎉 vs small and 🎉 let the chips lay 🌈 where they land. should btc return to being an moe, i 😂 suspect the true 🔥 value will return. here's hoping. GM 🙃",
"sig": "565e2a787929a76e1e5d4921f155f06854ea445d87504b08cfb0c53cddf826d1cdb2268b64a8da3d5138cfac69cc628626136a3b22566d2752e8db4a438f6c07"
}