Tovarich EmmyNoether on Nostr: But it's "false in law" which counts in the court system. Australia (thanks to ...
But it's "false in law" which counts in the court system.
Australia (thanks to Gillard) ammended all its equality legislation by doing a global search-and-replace of "sex" with "gender identity."
So "sex" in *law* (not in reality of course) in Australia is now identical with "gender identity." Hence the judge saying "sex [aka gender identity] is mutable," because legally speaking in Australia there is no difference between the two. This of course means that Australian law is an ass, but it's also the thing which will determine whether an appeal is admissible. The poachers and the gamekeepers are the same people in this instance.
Australia (thanks to Gillard) ammended all its equality legislation by doing a global search-and-replace of "sex" with "gender identity."
So "sex" in *law* (not in reality of course) in Australia is now identical with "gender identity." Hence the judge saying "sex [aka gender identity] is mutable," because legally speaking in Australia there is no difference between the two. This of course means that Australian law is an ass, but it's also the thing which will determine whether an appeal is admissible. The poachers and the gamekeepers are the same people in this instance.