Greg Sanders [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-11-19 📝 Original message: The hardfork variant is ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-11-19
📝 Original message:
The hardfork variant is quite simple, if I understood it correctly. You
just stick the signatures in another parallel merkle tree. So if you don't
want to validate signatures, just don't download them, and validate
everything else. TXIDs don't use the signature at all. Nothing to malleate,
AFAIK. Not sure what the softfork plan is, but it will be a talk at Scaling
Bitcoin HK.

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Glenn Tarbox, PhD <glenn at tarbox.org>
wrote:

>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:33 AM, sickpig at gmail.com <sickpig at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Pierre
>>
>> you could start here
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/ElementsProject/elementsproject.github.io#segregated-witness
>>
>> https://people.xiph.org/~greg/blockstream.gmaxwell.elements.talk.060815.pdf
>> https://github.com/ElementsProject/elements
>
>
> There was a brief blip on Reddit:
>
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3ngtx5/could_the_segregated_witness_part_of_the/cwnthlh
>
> Its weird how little information there is on Segregated Witness. I'm
> guessing its a simple concept and those working on it (sipa / gmaxwell)
> haven't felt the need to write it up.
>
> That it "apparently" can be done with a soft fork similar to P2SH is good
> news... I guess...
>
>
> --
> Glenn H. Tarbox, PhD
> =]|[=
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lightning-dev mailing list
> Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20151119/630dbc4e/attachment-0001.html>;