Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-03-28 📝 Original message:On 28/03/2014 17:59, ...

📅 Original date posted:2014-03-28
📝 Original message:On 28/03/2014 17:59, Andreas Schildbach wrote:
> Ok, why don't fix this in the spec for now, by defining a fixed expiry
> time. In the EU, most products are covered by a 2 years warranty, so it
> seems appropriate to pick 2.5 years (30 months) -- allowing for some
> time to ship the product back and forth.
Yeah I was thinking something like that on the walk home. But 2 years is
a long time. Do we have enough RAM for that? Plus warranties usually
result in the defective goods being replaced rather than a monetary
refund, right?

But adjusting the spec so there's a fixed time limit, and allowing a
future version of the protocol to make it configurable, does indeed feel
like the right way to go.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5971 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140328/66e42ad9/attachment.p7s>;