Tamas Blummer [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-02-12 📝 Original message:Mike, You can not consider ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-02-12
📝 Original message:Mike,
You can not consider the outcome resulting by replace-by-fee fraudulent, as it could be the world as observed by some.
Some other’s might have seen the replaced transaction, but that only indicates for sure that the signer is fraudulent.
What should a node do that really cares of good reputation? Ignore both to be on the safe side?
Tamas Blummer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150212/9e44ecf1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150212/9e44ecf1/attachment.sig>
📝 Original message:Mike,
You can not consider the outcome resulting by replace-by-fee fraudulent, as it could be the world as observed by some.
Some other’s might have seen the replaced transaction, but that only indicates for sure that the signer is fraudulent.
What should a node do that really cares of good reputation? Ignore both to be on the safe side?
Tamas Blummer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150212/9e44ecf1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150212/9e44ecf1/attachment.sig>