papaslag on Nostr: Workin on somethin and I'm curious if anyone know of, or has feedback for, a NOSTR ...
Workin on somethin and I'm curious if anyone know of, or has feedback for, a NOSTR based research ecosystem? I've worked in and know a lot of people in academia getting fucked by every angle (university obligations/IP restrictions, pay-to-publish funding from shady priviate/public institutions, who-you-know gatekeeping for publishing) and I think there's a potential for a NOSTR ecosystem to help with this.
Here's a distillation of what I'm thinking (using AI to help me distill my thoughts):
I. Overview
This ecosystem leverages the NOSTR protocol and Bitcoin's Lightning Network to create a decentralized, transparent, and efficient marketplace for academic research. It encompasses the entire research lifecycle from proposal to citation, integrating funding, collaboration, peer review, and reputation management.
II. Key Stakeholders
A. Researchers
- Role: Propose, conduct, and publish research; collaborate with peers
- Interactions: Submit research plans, seek funding, conduct peer reviews, collaborate on projects, publish findings, cite other work
- Benefits: Direct access to funding, broader collaboration opportunities, reputation building, immediate rewards for impactful work
B. Funders
- Role: Provide financial support for research projects
- Interactions: Review research proposals, contribute funds via Lightning Network
- Benefits: Direct influence on research directions, potential returns (financial or knowledge) from successful projects
C. Peer Reviewers
- Role: Evaluate research proposals and publications
- Interactions: Review submitted plans and papers, provide feedback, influence funding decisions
- Benefits: Contribute to research quality, build reputation, potential compensation for reviews
III. Key Mechanisms
A. Cryptographic Linking
1. Research Plans:
- Hashed and stored on NOSTR, creating an immutable record
- Linked to researcher's identity and reputation
2. Funding:
- Each contribution cryptographically linked to the research plan
- Creates transparent, verifiable funding trail
3. Peer Review:
- Reviews linked to both the reviewer and the research plan/publication
- Ensures accountability and builds reviewer reputation
4. Citations:
- Each citation event cryptographically linked to both citing and cited works
- Enables automatic tracking of research impact and facilitates micropayments
B. Lightning Network Payment Flow
1. Funding Stage:
- Funders send BTC to researchers via Lightning Network
- Payments linked to specific research plans
2. Collaboration Payments:
- Automated distribution of funds among collaborators based on predefined terms
3. Citation Micropayments:
- Small payments automatically sent to cited researchers upon publication
- Creates direct financial incentive for impactful research
C. NOSTR Protocol Facilitation
1. Data Storage and Retrieval:
- Research plans, publications, reviews stored as NOSTR events
- Ensures data persistence and easy retrieval
2. Identity Management:
- Researchers, funders, and reviewers have persistent identities on NOSTR
- Enables reputation building and accountability
3. Real-time Updates:
- New publications, citations, and funding events propagated in real-time
- Keeps all participants updated on ecosystem activities
4. Decentralized Architecture:
- No central authority controlling the flow of information or funds
- Resistant to censorship and single points of failure
IV. System Flow
1. Research Proposal:
- Researcher publishes a plan on NOSTR
- Plan includes detailed methodology and funding requirements
2. Peer Review of Proposal:
- Qualified peers review the proposal
- Reviews are linked to both reviewer and proposal
3. Crowdfunding:
- Approved proposals open for funding
- Funders contribute via Lightning Network
4. Research and Collaboration:
- Funded researchers conduct work, potentially collaborating with others
- Progress updates published on NOSTR
5. Publication:
- Completed research published on NOSTR
- Linked to original proposal, funding, and collaboration data
6. Citation and Impact:
- Other researchers cite the work
- Each citation triggers micropayment and updates reputation scores
7. Continuous Reputation Update:
- All actions (proposing, funding, reviewing, publishing, citing) update reputations
- Reputation scores influence future interactions in the ecosystem
V. Key Advantages
1. Transparency: All actions and interactions are public and verifiable
2. Efficiency: Automated payments and reputation updates reduce administrative overhead
3. Meritocracy: Reputation-based system rewards quality contributions
4. Global Collaboration: Reduces barriers to international and cross-institutional collaboration
5. Rapid Dissemination: Real-time updates accelerate the spread of new knowledge
6. Financial Sustainability: Direct rewards for impactful work can provide ongoing funding for researchers
VI. Challenges and Considerations
1. Technical Barriers: Requires familiarity with cryptocurrency and decentralized systems
2. Regulatory Compliance: Need to navigate varying international laws on cryptocurrency and research funding
3. Quality Control: Maintaining high standards without traditional institutional oversight
4. Privacy Concerns: Balancing transparency with necessary confidentiality in sensitive research areas
5. Volatility: Cryptocurrency price fluctuations could affect funding stability
6. Adoption: Overcoming inertia of traditional academic systems and practices
All in all, I think there's something here but it's just an idea seed at the moment. Curious what you think #nostr.
Tags for vis, #bitcoin #asknostr
Here's a distillation of what I'm thinking (using AI to help me distill my thoughts):
I. Overview
This ecosystem leverages the NOSTR protocol and Bitcoin's Lightning Network to create a decentralized, transparent, and efficient marketplace for academic research. It encompasses the entire research lifecycle from proposal to citation, integrating funding, collaboration, peer review, and reputation management.
II. Key Stakeholders
A. Researchers
- Role: Propose, conduct, and publish research; collaborate with peers
- Interactions: Submit research plans, seek funding, conduct peer reviews, collaborate on projects, publish findings, cite other work
- Benefits: Direct access to funding, broader collaboration opportunities, reputation building, immediate rewards for impactful work
B. Funders
- Role: Provide financial support for research projects
- Interactions: Review research proposals, contribute funds via Lightning Network
- Benefits: Direct influence on research directions, potential returns (financial or knowledge) from successful projects
C. Peer Reviewers
- Role: Evaluate research proposals and publications
- Interactions: Review submitted plans and papers, provide feedback, influence funding decisions
- Benefits: Contribute to research quality, build reputation, potential compensation for reviews
III. Key Mechanisms
A. Cryptographic Linking
1. Research Plans:
- Hashed and stored on NOSTR, creating an immutable record
- Linked to researcher's identity and reputation
2. Funding:
- Each contribution cryptographically linked to the research plan
- Creates transparent, verifiable funding trail
3. Peer Review:
- Reviews linked to both the reviewer and the research plan/publication
- Ensures accountability and builds reviewer reputation
4. Citations:
- Each citation event cryptographically linked to both citing and cited works
- Enables automatic tracking of research impact and facilitates micropayments
B. Lightning Network Payment Flow
1. Funding Stage:
- Funders send BTC to researchers via Lightning Network
- Payments linked to specific research plans
2. Collaboration Payments:
- Automated distribution of funds among collaborators based on predefined terms
3. Citation Micropayments:
- Small payments automatically sent to cited researchers upon publication
- Creates direct financial incentive for impactful research
C. NOSTR Protocol Facilitation
1. Data Storage and Retrieval:
- Research plans, publications, reviews stored as NOSTR events
- Ensures data persistence and easy retrieval
2. Identity Management:
- Researchers, funders, and reviewers have persistent identities on NOSTR
- Enables reputation building and accountability
3. Real-time Updates:
- New publications, citations, and funding events propagated in real-time
- Keeps all participants updated on ecosystem activities
4. Decentralized Architecture:
- No central authority controlling the flow of information or funds
- Resistant to censorship and single points of failure
IV. System Flow
1. Research Proposal:
- Researcher publishes a plan on NOSTR
- Plan includes detailed methodology and funding requirements
2. Peer Review of Proposal:
- Qualified peers review the proposal
- Reviews are linked to both reviewer and proposal
3. Crowdfunding:
- Approved proposals open for funding
- Funders contribute via Lightning Network
4. Research and Collaboration:
- Funded researchers conduct work, potentially collaborating with others
- Progress updates published on NOSTR
5. Publication:
- Completed research published on NOSTR
- Linked to original proposal, funding, and collaboration data
6. Citation and Impact:
- Other researchers cite the work
- Each citation triggers micropayment and updates reputation scores
7. Continuous Reputation Update:
- All actions (proposing, funding, reviewing, publishing, citing) update reputations
- Reputation scores influence future interactions in the ecosystem
V. Key Advantages
1. Transparency: All actions and interactions are public and verifiable
2. Efficiency: Automated payments and reputation updates reduce administrative overhead
3. Meritocracy: Reputation-based system rewards quality contributions
4. Global Collaboration: Reduces barriers to international and cross-institutional collaboration
5. Rapid Dissemination: Real-time updates accelerate the spread of new knowledge
6. Financial Sustainability: Direct rewards for impactful work can provide ongoing funding for researchers
VI. Challenges and Considerations
1. Technical Barriers: Requires familiarity with cryptocurrency and decentralized systems
2. Regulatory Compliance: Need to navigate varying international laws on cryptocurrency and research funding
3. Quality Control: Maintaining high standards without traditional institutional oversight
4. Privacy Concerns: Balancing transparency with necessary confidentiality in sensitive research areas
5. Volatility: Cryptocurrency price fluctuations could affect funding stability
6. Adoption: Overcoming inertia of traditional academic systems and practices
All in all, I think there's something here but it's just an idea seed at the moment. Curious what you think #nostr.
Tags for vis, #bitcoin #asknostr