Tom Zander [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2017-04-14 📝 Original message:On Friday, 14 April 2017 ...
📅 Original date posted:2017-04-14
📝 Original message:On Friday, 14 April 2017 22:51:04 CEST James Hilliard wrote:
> This doesn't remove the need for consensus rule enforcement of course.
Thanks for confirming my point.
This means that Gregory was incorrect saying that there is no risk to a non-
upgraded node on a SegWit network mining a new invalid block. That risk is
most definitely there for any miners "left behind" operating on a different
set of consensus rules than the majority.
Kind of obvious, when you think about it.
--
Tom Zander
Blog: https://zander.github.io
Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel
📝 Original message:On Friday, 14 April 2017 22:51:04 CEST James Hilliard wrote:
> This doesn't remove the need for consensus rule enforcement of course.
Thanks for confirming my point.
This means that Gregory was incorrect saying that there is no risk to a non-
upgraded node on a SegWit network mining a new invalid block. That risk is
most definitely there for any miners "left behind" operating on a different
set of consensus rules than the majority.
Kind of obvious, when you think about it.
--
Tom Zander
Blog: https://zander.github.io
Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel