mleku on Nostr: yeah, i do need to do more research on this but the key is there will be, almost ...
yeah, i do need to do more research on this but the key is there will be, almost certainly, a geographic pole change triggered by an increase of absorbed energy overcoming crustal friction and the fact that we are coming into a 90 degree shift point, which spans about 100 years in total, and causes a massive burst of energy to feed into everything around us
and the best data at the moment suggests that the crustal magnetic fields are ready to align best between gulf of mexico and the western pacific, which puts the new equator zone between hawaii and the band through balkans, baltics and central africa
i'm pretty sure the flip axis was similar as the previous time, which is also why the majority of surviving artifacts from the previous cycle are found in the region around egypt and greece/turkey, ie, that is where the equator was 12000 years ago.
the other thing about the landmasses around that area is that is a majority of land, between africa and eastern europe/west asia, massive amount of land, the logical place where if the equator passed through where i'm saying, it would explain all of the evidence of past history concentrate there
because that's where the people were! just like now, most of the people live in the tropic band, 23 degrees either side of the current equator
the crust is pretty slow changing, so i think it's likely that in the phase shift it goes back, mostly, to the old alignment, and this region i speak of will become the new equator, and yes it includes hawaii
i think there is arguments definitely in favor of anchoring in hawaii, that are the opposite arguments why to pick thte vertical band crossing through balkans and baltics
and the best data at the moment suggests that the crustal magnetic fields are ready to align best between gulf of mexico and the western pacific, which puts the new equator zone between hawaii and the band through balkans, baltics and central africa
i'm pretty sure the flip axis was similar as the previous time, which is also why the majority of surviving artifacts from the previous cycle are found in the region around egypt and greece/turkey, ie, that is where the equator was 12000 years ago.
the other thing about the landmasses around that area is that is a majority of land, between africa and eastern europe/west asia, massive amount of land, the logical place where if the equator passed through where i'm saying, it would explain all of the evidence of past history concentrate there
because that's where the people were! just like now, most of the people live in the tropic band, 23 degrees either side of the current equator
the crust is pretty slow changing, so i think it's likely that in the phase shift it goes back, mostly, to the old alignment, and this region i speak of will become the new equator, and yes it includes hawaii
i think there is arguments definitely in favor of anchoring in hawaii, that are the opposite arguments why to pick thte vertical band crossing through balkans and baltics