Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-06-15 📝 Original message:> > It's simple: either ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-06-15
📝 Original message:>
> It's simple: either you care about validation, and you must validate
> everything, or you don't, and you don't validate anything.
>
Pedantically: you could validate a random subset of all scripts, to give
yourself probabilistic verification rather than full vs SPV. If enough
people do it with a large enough subset the probability of a problem being
detected goes up a lot. You still pay the cost of the database updates.
But your main point is of course completely right, that side chains are not
a way to scale up.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150615/887958ae/attachment.html>;
📝 Original message:>
> It's simple: either you care about validation, and you must validate
> everything, or you don't, and you don't validate anything.
>
Pedantically: you could validate a random subset of all scripts, to give
yourself probabilistic verification rather than full vs SPV. If enough
people do it with a large enough subset the probability of a problem being
detected goes up a lot. You still pay the cost of the database updates.
But your main point is of course completely right, that side chains are not
a way to scale up.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150615/887958ae/attachment.html>;