Raw on Nostr: Seems like that. Now here is my "Opinion" But it should not be the case. The and is ...
Seems like that.
Now here is my "Opinion"
But it should not be the case. The and is there because in certain cases 90 days in prision is not enough of a punishment so add 100$ and, "or" is there because in certain situation the 90 days in prision is too harsh of a punishment. Usually there is also "Upto" in beginning. This accounts for situations and facts in a crime and is judge's discretion to choose from. Not every crime is same so gives a certain leeway for a judge to choose from.
The fine is also stuck there it cannot increase as it has to account for the poor too. Certainly if restitution was to be given for 90 days it will not be just 100$.
Just my opinion some Jurisprudence guys can chime in, it's not really my are. My explanation sounds logical to me tho.
Now here is my "Opinion"
But it should not be the case. The and is there because in certain cases 90 days in prision is not enough of a punishment so add 100$ and, "or" is there because in certain situation the 90 days in prision is too harsh of a punishment. Usually there is also "Upto" in beginning. This accounts for situations and facts in a crime and is judge's discretion to choose from. Not every crime is same so gives a certain leeway for a judge to choose from.
The fine is also stuck there it cannot increase as it has to account for the poor too. Certainly if restitution was to be given for 90 days it will not be just 100$.
Just my opinion some Jurisprudence guys can chime in, it's not really my are. My explanation sounds logical to me tho.