Anarthlic on Nostr: Not everything is worth arguing syllogistically and academically. It is an ...

Not everything is worth arguing syllogistically and academically. It is an ‘intellectual’ trap and waste of time and energy, accelerating entropy. This is exactly how neo-intellectuals (those who dominate academia, the peer-review, and so-called ‘science’) were created; and over time, concocted their Cartesian plane and placed the entire world on it via their ‘science’ labelled with the cringe—‘scholarly’ (stealing from the Scholastics but anything but), ‘peer-review’, and ‘academic’. Inductive logic (majority from the Cartesian-Kantian club wins) was/ is the oil that sustained/ s the life of this plane; and Cartesian-Kantian club generated tokens such as journal rankings, tenure, and other titles, slogans, and labels became the currency. They are no different from the mainstream media.

This was/ is also why the old (real) intellectuals moved out. They don’t like to daydream and they don’t like arcades. They know time is finite and even if energy can neither be created nor destroyed, they know you can’t stop entropy; hence, they would rather not help accelerate it.

Reading academic journals, is now, more than ever, such a mortifying task. One feels a loss of brain cells every time.