Event JSON
{
"id": "daacd2248a00a303830e6140df660d7116653b741950e3d097ecb56382295d6a",
"pubkey": "51ff12141e3e1dd8f57dbca9e567ba98ba8a57d3ef64c34d5d303f3df0dbfcdd",
"created_at": 1739213439,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"r",
"https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/10/us/politics/supreme-court-libel-precedent.html"
],
[
"subject",
"Supreme Court Signals That Landmark Libel Ruling Is Secure"
],
[
"published_at",
"1739181749"
],
[
"image",
"https://static01.nyt.com/images/2025/02/10/multimedia/10dc-bar1-vftz/10dc-bar1-vftz-mediumSquareAt3X.jpg"
],
[
"p",
"51ff12141e3e1dd8f57dbca9e567ba98ba8a57d3ef64c34d5d303f3df0dbfcdd",
"wss://articles.layer3.news"
],
[
"imeta",
"url https://static01.nyt.com/images/2025/02/10/multimedia/10dc-bar1-vftz/10dc-bar1-vftz-mediumSquareAt3X.jpg"
],
[
"t",
"liberal:perspective"
],
[
"summary",
"The New York Times v. Sullivan ruling, which protected freedom of speech by setting a high bar for proving defamation, has been consistently cited by the Supreme Court in its decisions. However, it has also been criticized by some lower-court judges and litigants, who argue that the ruling has been misused to silence criticism of public figures. Despite this criticism, the ruling remains an important precedent in the area of freedom of speech."
]
],
"content": "nostr:nprofile1qyd8wumn8ghj7ctjw35kxmr9wvhxcctev4erxtnwv4mhxqpq28l3y9q78cwa3atahj572ea6nzag547naajvxn2axqlnmuxmlnws7lkxmq\nhttps://static01.nyt.com/images/2025/02/10/multimedia/10dc-bar1-vftz/10dc-bar1-vftz-mediumSquareAt3X.jpg\nAttacked by two justices, lower-court judges and litigants, the 1964 ruling in New York Times v. Sullivan keeps getting cited approvingly in the Supreme Court’s decisions.\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/10/us/politics/supreme-court-libel-precedent.html",
"sig": "e166d37b775b95f400a192b63c4fcb46c51ebe5714ae4994b0e0dcd7e9f5fa0b0738e35dc5d6f2c049259156093fba10eab9ae192801b3158c5250bafbfa11c2"
}
