⚡Eineygður ☯ Flakkari⚡ on Nostr: 卐 Niggi Hardare 卍 Sun バツ子（旅行モード Right. Like I said, the ...
卐 Niggi Hardare 卍 (nprofile…ckkr) Sun (nprofile…h6f2) バツ子（旅行モード (nprofile…n64p)
Right. Like I said, the ontological demarcation problem et al. There's also parallels with the understanding that consciousness is inherently dependent on differentiation, such as in the primordial experience of difference between perceiver/observer and perceived/observed. As such absolute oneness/unity is not something which can be consciously experienced. Hence "no mind" or the total cessation of consciousness (and therefore of all forms of categorisation) being intrinsic to the ultimate transcendent state.
For the same token, no one can claim that such a state is practically achievable, since even if they had, they'd never be able to remember the experience to speak of it. Hence, if you see the Buddha on the road, kill him. The perfect transcendent being doesn't exist either. Only imperfect philosophers walking around making unfalsifiable claims about it with their empty alms bowls outstretched.
Right. Like I said, the ontological demarcation problem et al. There's also parallels with the understanding that consciousness is inherently dependent on differentiation, such as in the primordial experience of difference between perceiver/observer and perceived/observed. As such absolute oneness/unity is not something which can be consciously experienced. Hence "no mind" or the total cessation of consciousness (and therefore of all forms of categorisation) being intrinsic to the ultimate transcendent state.
For the same token, no one can claim that such a state is practically achievable, since even if they had, they'd never be able to remember the experience to speak of it. Hence, if you see the Buddha on the road, kill him. The perfect transcendent being doesn't exist either. Only imperfect philosophers walking around making unfalsifiable claims about it with their empty alms bowls outstretched.