wakoinc on Nostr: For one, AI can do the classification in the future - even client side. It’s likely ...
For one, AI can do the classification in the future - even client side. It’s likely a bad thing for censorship resistance, but alas you can’t un-invent technology.
Two, agreed. It’s a developing area. It impacts a lot of things. But just as people infiltrate LinkedIn and friend all your colleagues to look legit, the same will happen on decentralised networks. Network Trust schemes at scale are weirdly more susceptible to imposters.
Three, I’m comparing how the protocol level should be designed for censorship resistance in all aspects. It’s literally why Nostr exists. What people can censor is their own private/community relays - set one up, host whatever content you like, allow who ever you give permission to, ban people - but that doesn’t impact the Nostr Protocol.
Ideas are great - but worthless without being executed in a way that’s possible (it can’t be a fake solution that is vapourware), and actually consider and address how they will fail or their side effects.
Two, agreed. It’s a developing area. It impacts a lot of things. But just as people infiltrate LinkedIn and friend all your colleagues to look legit, the same will happen on decentralised networks. Network Trust schemes at scale are weirdly more susceptible to imposters.
Three, I’m comparing how the protocol level should be designed for censorship resistance in all aspects. It’s literally why Nostr exists. What people can censor is their own private/community relays - set one up, host whatever content you like, allow who ever you give permission to, ban people - but that doesn’t impact the Nostr Protocol.
Ideas are great - but worthless without being executed in a way that’s possible (it can’t be a fake solution that is vapourware), and actually consider and address how they will fail or their side effects.