Thomas Zander [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: ๐ Original date posted:2015-08-10 ๐ Original message:On Monday 10. August 2015 ...
๐
Original date posted:2015-08-10
๐ Original message:On Monday 10. August 2015 13.55.03 Jorge Timรณn via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Gavin, I interpret the absence of response to these questions as a
> sign that everybody agrees that there's no other reason to increase
> the consensus block size other than to avoid minimum market fees from
> rising (above zero).
> Feel free to correct that notion at any time by answering the
> questions yourself.
> In fact if any other "big block size advocate" thinks there's more
> reason I would like to hear their reasons too.
See my various emails in the last hour.
--
Thomas Zander
๐ Original message:On Monday 10. August 2015 13.55.03 Jorge Timรณn via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Gavin, I interpret the absence of response to these questions as a
> sign that everybody agrees that there's no other reason to increase
> the consensus block size other than to avoid minimum market fees from
> rising (above zero).
> Feel free to correct that notion at any time by answering the
> questions yourself.
> In fact if any other "big block size advocate" thinks there's more
> reason I would like to hear their reasons too.
See my various emails in the last hour.
--
Thomas Zander