SamuelGabrielSG on Nostr: The Kaitlan Collins Controversy and the Psychology of Hybristophilia ...
The Kaitlan Collins Controversy and the Psychology of Hybristophilia
Introduction
The recent controversy surrounding CNN's Kaitlan Collins and her since-deleted social media post about Luigi Mangione’s legal defense fund has sparked widespread discussion about journalistic ethics and public perceptions of high-profile criminal cases. The incident has also drawn attention to a lesser-known psychological phenomenon: hybristophilia, a condition in which individuals exhibit an attraction to those who commit serious crimes. Understanding this dynamic provides critical insight into the public’s fascination with notorious figures and the role of media in shaping these narratives.
The Incident: Media Influence and Public Reaction
On February 15, 2025, Kaitlan Collins, CNN's chief White House correspondent, shared a link to a website created by Luigi Mangione’s defense team. Mangione, accused of assassinating UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in December 2024, had garnered significant public attention. His website not only provided updates on his legal proceedings but also featured messages of gratitude for the overwhelming support he had received.
The post ignited immediate backlash, leading Collins to delete it shortly after. The controversy raised questions about the ethical responsibilities of journalists when covering high-profile cases and the unintended consequences of amplifying such narratives. Notably, Mangione’s defense fund received nearly $300,000 in donations, illustrating the extent of public engagement in the case.
Understanding Hybristophilia: The Attraction to Criminals
The financial and emotional support surrounding Mangione’s case reflects a broader societal fascination with individuals accused of serious crimes. This phenomenon, known as hybristophilia, is a paraphilia in which individuals experience romantic or sexual attraction to criminals, particularly those involved in violent offenses.
Coined by psychologist John Money in 1986, hybristophilia derives from the Greek words hybrizein (meaning “to commit an outrage against someone”) and philia (meaning “love” or “strong affinity”). While this condition manifests in various ways, it has been most notably observed in the admirers of infamous criminals such as Ted Bundy, Richard Ramirez, and Charles Manson, all of whom received significant attention from romantic partners and supporters despite—or perhaps because of—their crimes.
Psychologists suggest multiple motivations behind hybristophilia, including:
A belief that the criminal is misunderstood or wrongfully accused.
A desire to “fix” or rehabilitate the individual.
An attraction to danger, power, or notoriety.
A psychological need for control in relationships, where the incarcerated individual is perceived as less threatening.
The Digital Age and the Rise of Criminal Admiration
In an era of instant digital communication, cases like Mangione’s can quickly garner public attention, fueling communities of supporters who rally behind accused criminals. Social media platforms and crowdfunding sites enable individuals to connect, discuss, and financially support such figures in ways previously unimaginable.
While not all supporters exhibit hybristophilic tendencies, the romanticization of alleged criminals on digital platforms blurs the line between advocacy and attraction. Some individuals are drawn to the mystique surrounding controversial figures, while others engage in active campaign efforts, raising ethical concerns about the nature of public involvement in criminal proceedings.
Ethical Considerations and Media Responsibility
The intersection of media coverage, public fascination, and hybristophilia presents significant ethical challenges. Journalists and news outlets must navigate the fine line between reporting on high-profile cases and inadvertently contributing to the glorification of alleged criminals.
Responsible journalism entails:
Providing balanced reporting that avoids sensationalism.
Offering context about the broader implications of criminal cases.
Recognizing the psychological and social factors that contribute to public support for accused individuals.
Avoiding undue amplification of narratives that could lead to unintended consequences, such as increased public sympathy for perpetrators of serious crimes.
Conclusion
The Kaitlan Collins incident underscores the broader dynamics of media influence, public intrigue with crime, and the psychological phenomenon of hybristophilia. While the legal and ethical dimensions of such cases remain complex, understanding the psychological motivations behind public support for criminals is essential for fostering informed discourse. Moving forward, responsible journalism and critical public engagement will be key to ensuring that high-profile cases are handled with sensitivity and awareness of their societal impact.

Introduction
The recent controversy surrounding CNN's Kaitlan Collins and her since-deleted social media post about Luigi Mangione’s legal defense fund has sparked widespread discussion about journalistic ethics and public perceptions of high-profile criminal cases. The incident has also drawn attention to a lesser-known psychological phenomenon: hybristophilia, a condition in which individuals exhibit an attraction to those who commit serious crimes. Understanding this dynamic provides critical insight into the public’s fascination with notorious figures and the role of media in shaping these narratives.
The Incident: Media Influence and Public Reaction
On February 15, 2025, Kaitlan Collins, CNN's chief White House correspondent, shared a link to a website created by Luigi Mangione’s defense team. Mangione, accused of assassinating UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in December 2024, had garnered significant public attention. His website not only provided updates on his legal proceedings but also featured messages of gratitude for the overwhelming support he had received.
The post ignited immediate backlash, leading Collins to delete it shortly after. The controversy raised questions about the ethical responsibilities of journalists when covering high-profile cases and the unintended consequences of amplifying such narratives. Notably, Mangione’s defense fund received nearly $300,000 in donations, illustrating the extent of public engagement in the case.
Understanding Hybristophilia: The Attraction to Criminals
The financial and emotional support surrounding Mangione’s case reflects a broader societal fascination with individuals accused of serious crimes. This phenomenon, known as hybristophilia, is a paraphilia in which individuals experience romantic or sexual attraction to criminals, particularly those involved in violent offenses.
Coined by psychologist John Money in 1986, hybristophilia derives from the Greek words hybrizein (meaning “to commit an outrage against someone”) and philia (meaning “love” or “strong affinity”). While this condition manifests in various ways, it has been most notably observed in the admirers of infamous criminals such as Ted Bundy, Richard Ramirez, and Charles Manson, all of whom received significant attention from romantic partners and supporters despite—or perhaps because of—their crimes.
Psychologists suggest multiple motivations behind hybristophilia, including:
A belief that the criminal is misunderstood or wrongfully accused.
A desire to “fix” or rehabilitate the individual.
An attraction to danger, power, or notoriety.
A psychological need for control in relationships, where the incarcerated individual is perceived as less threatening.
The Digital Age and the Rise of Criminal Admiration
In an era of instant digital communication, cases like Mangione’s can quickly garner public attention, fueling communities of supporters who rally behind accused criminals. Social media platforms and crowdfunding sites enable individuals to connect, discuss, and financially support such figures in ways previously unimaginable.
While not all supporters exhibit hybristophilic tendencies, the romanticization of alleged criminals on digital platforms blurs the line between advocacy and attraction. Some individuals are drawn to the mystique surrounding controversial figures, while others engage in active campaign efforts, raising ethical concerns about the nature of public involvement in criminal proceedings.
Ethical Considerations and Media Responsibility
The intersection of media coverage, public fascination, and hybristophilia presents significant ethical challenges. Journalists and news outlets must navigate the fine line between reporting on high-profile cases and inadvertently contributing to the glorification of alleged criminals.
Responsible journalism entails:
Providing balanced reporting that avoids sensationalism.
Offering context about the broader implications of criminal cases.
Recognizing the psychological and social factors that contribute to public support for accused individuals.
Avoiding undue amplification of narratives that could lead to unintended consequences, such as increased public sympathy for perpetrators of serious crimes.
Conclusion
The Kaitlan Collins incident underscores the broader dynamics of media influence, public intrigue with crime, and the psychological phenomenon of hybristophilia. While the legal and ethical dimensions of such cases remain complex, understanding the psychological motivations behind public support for criminals is essential for fostering informed discourse. Moving forward, responsible journalism and critical public engagement will be key to ensuring that high-profile cases are handled with sensitivity and awareness of their societal impact.