Oneofus on Nostr: Bitcoin's L1 architecture makes widespread self-custody on the L1 technically ...
Bitcoin's L1 architecture makes widespread self-custody on the L1 technically infeasible, regardless of setup (single-sig or multi-sig). Self-custodial Lightning wallets have proven inadequate due to their complexity and channel liquidity requirements. Sidechains like Liquid are not a viable solution either, as long as BTC can only be moved to L-BTC with one's own node but not vice versa. A truly decentralized L2 is needed, where billions of users can securely keep small amounts of BTC in multi-sig wallets and easily move it to the main chain when the UTXO exceeds a million sats.
Published at
2024-10-24 10:12:48Event JSON
{
"id": "5146e519357b3dc015320cd9e0940e8fb2b79ffc0d1c2312df2c9e3a17eab1d6",
"pubkey": "2e1d7a6afc2185953c44c957fc106d4e80f1dfdd51652004e973ff7fc916b368",
"created_at": 1729764768,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0a3cb5f43df5e59df81409e185eaceb9d0df24dad980a3f67a920b7b019680b3",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"b9e76546ba06456ed301d9e52bc49fa48e70a6bf2282be7a1ae72947612023dc"
]
],
"content": "Bitcoin's L1 architecture makes widespread self-custody on the L1 technically infeasible, regardless of setup (single-sig or multi-sig). Self-custodial Lightning wallets have proven inadequate due to their complexity and channel liquidity requirements. Sidechains like Liquid are not a viable solution either, as long as BTC can only be moved to L-BTC with one's own node but not vice versa. A truly decentralized L2 is needed, where billions of users can securely keep small amounts of BTC in multi-sig wallets and easily move it to the main chain when the UTXO exceeds a million sats.",
"sig": "9f10f32b0f4711510bfb66e51bd4ab9bdde6cc388853b8424900085cd237c7354b560cb477796329c8f6f5ad25532b92f334c7fc107de1b6300926f0b12122db"
}
