Chris Geidner on Nostr: In Eknes-Tucker, allowing Alabama's ban to go into effect, the 11th Circuit noted the ...
In Eknes-Tucker, allowing Alabama's ban to go into effect, the 11th Circuit noted the trial court there had not found the law was based on invidious discrimination.
Here, Grant and Luck treat it like that's a loophole that the district court used in considering Florida's law.
Published at
2024-08-26 22:19:30Event JSON
{
"id": "56043f34fe5d359c7bc3cdb368864ba711b74a3d7f8dbf5ca81700d8c75947e3",
"pubkey": "eddababc906fdb7a0d1c75ae227442a9e64932f51f0d19ca245e311481f9c461",
"created_at": 1724710770,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"722c53a6d64bba2dda91f60a50033ce9a34c6aa4865402898e71bcfe2768d608",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://journa.host/users/chrisgeidner/statuses/113030645046219546",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "In Eknes-Tucker, allowing Alabama's ban to go into effect, the 11th Circuit noted the trial court there had not found the law was based on invidious discrimination. \n\nHere, Grant and Luck treat it like that's a loophole that the district court used in considering Florida's law.\n\nhttps://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/113/030/644/805/612/737/original/b2da93a019cb2837.png",
"sig": "c5915bf79f0b38e1e647ac68f840f23ad6a543ad69ee56341392b6aa1fef11eefcdfaddbc5562028dc33f860bbb817c7f95a4991d13a2a2f2a1873e14c4c1907"
}
