📅 Original date posted:2017-03-08 📝 Original message:> >> >>

📅 Original date posted:2017-03-08
📝 Original message:>
>>
>> > Nodes are by design not supposed to be identifiable in any way
>
> This is of course my objection to BIP150 ("a way for peers to ... guarantee node ownership“).

Please Eric. Stop spreading FUD.
BIP150 has a fingerprint-free **OPTIONAL** authentication. It’s designed to not reveal any node identifier/identity without first get a crypto.-proof from other peer that he already knows your identity.
**Peers can’t be identified without having the identity-keys pre shared by the node operators.**

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170308/a20244e4/attachment.html>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170308/a20244e4/attachment.sig>;

Jonas Schnelli [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2017-03-08 📝 Original message:> >> >> > Nodes are by ...