Ryan Grant [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2022-06-08 📝 Original message:I think Jorge's request ...
📅 Original date posted:2022-06-08
📝 Original message:I think Jorge's request for specifics is reasonable. I agree that we
can raise the level of discussion. Each claim about how good or bad a
specific BIP is should say why on the technical merits. Comments on
prior claims may expose misinformation, expose "trust me" authority,
or point out other fallacies. They should include a citation of the
original source, a fair restatement of the problematic claim for
current readers, and a short explanation of why it doesn't advance
understanding technical consensus.
There have been lots of mean comments. Some "Truth and
Reconciliation" will come due, and it will be a huge amount of work.
Another history book?
📝 Original message:I think Jorge's request for specifics is reasonable. I agree that we
can raise the level of discussion. Each claim about how good or bad a
specific BIP is should say why on the technical merits. Comments on
prior claims may expose misinformation, expose "trust me" authority,
or point out other fallacies. They should include a citation of the
original source, a fair restatement of the problematic claim for
current readers, and a short explanation of why it doesn't advance
understanding technical consensus.
There have been lots of mean comments. Some "Truth and
Reconciliation" will come due, and it will be a huge amount of work.
Another history book?