Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-09-17 📝 Original message:Mark Friedenbach via ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-09-17
📝 Original message:Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
writes:
> Eric, that would be, I think, my sequencenumbers2 branch in which nSequence
> is an explicit relative lock-time field (unless the most significant bit is
> set). That has absolutely clear semantics. You should comment on #6312
> where this is being discussed.
Indeed. Simplicity wins. We have half the number space left for the
future, too. If people are paranoid, reserve the top *two* bits.
Thanks,
Rusty.
📝 Original message:Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
writes:
> Eric, that would be, I think, my sequencenumbers2 branch in which nSequence
> is an explicit relative lock-time field (unless the most significant bit is
> set). That has absolutely clear semantics. You should comment on #6312
> where this is being discussed.
Indeed. Simplicity wins. We have half the number space left for the
future, too. If people are paranoid, reserve the top *two* bits.
Thanks,
Rusty.