DK on Nostr: To be clear my comments about "assuming a single future scenario" is about people who ...
To be clear my comments about "assuming a single future scenario" is about people who say "Bitcoin has a security budget problem".
A hypothetical assumption about a long-dated future state, made from variables that change over time and are adapted to by thinking actors, is not a problem. It is a scenario, and many have ideated ways that scenario might be adjusted to, to user's of Bitcoin's benefit, without any change to the protocol's current construction.
And if the response to this is "but fees will be too high to buy coffee on L1", then you've already abandoned your original complaint, and ignored other solutions that already exist.
A hypothetical assumption about a long-dated future state, made from variables that change over time and are adapted to by thinking actors, is not a problem. It is a scenario, and many have ideated ways that scenario might be adjusted to, to user's of Bitcoin's benefit, without any change to the protocol's current construction.
And if the response to this is "but fees will be too high to buy coffee on L1", then you've already abandoned your original complaint, and ignored other solutions that already exist.