dangrsmind on Nostr: npub1lzz05…djhl3 There's nothing new about the Republican agenda going back over a ...
npub1lzz05275zkk6zwuzel45jusr74ftyyuah8zll8vl09k98w8smy7qedjhl3 (npub1lzz…jhl3) There's nothing new about the Republican agenda going back over a decade at least.
Multiple people replied to my post arguing about what this meant for the election to which I replied. So that's why I am talking about the election.
There hasn't been any doubt that Trump would be the nominee for some time now. The news is focusing on this to drive engagement but Iowa is not a good indicator of the general election outcome (check the history) nor is it considered to be a swing state.
So Iowa was always going to give the GQP nominee 4 electoral votes and that nominee was always going to be Trump.
None of the other candidates produced a blip on the radar except in the minds of the press.
Multiple people replied to my post arguing about what this meant for the election to which I replied. So that's why I am talking about the election.
There hasn't been any doubt that Trump would be the nominee for some time now. The news is focusing on this to drive engagement but Iowa is not a good indicator of the general election outcome (check the history) nor is it considered to be a swing state.
So Iowa was always going to give the GQP nominee 4 electoral votes and that nominee was always going to be Trump.
None of the other candidates produced a blip on the radar except in the minds of the press.