Douglas Huff [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2011-07-04 🗒️ Summary of this message: Breaking unsafe ...
📅 Original date posted:2011-07-04
🗒️ Summary of this message: Breaking unsafe backup mechanisms is desirable as import/export is planned to be merged, and backupwallet RPC command will still work.
📝 Original message:On Jul 4, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> RE: breaking backup scripts: if they use the backupwallet RPC
> command, then they will Just Work.
I'd go a step further and say that, since import/export is planned to get merged at about the same time, intentionally breaking unsafe/badly designed backup mechanisms is actually desirable.
--
Douglas Huff
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 881 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20110704/a85cd314/attachment.sig>
🗒️ Summary of this message: Breaking unsafe backup mechanisms is desirable as import/export is planned to be merged, and backupwallet RPC command will still work.
📝 Original message:On Jul 4, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> RE: breaking backup scripts: if they use the backupwallet RPC
> command, then they will Just Work.
I'd go a step further and say that, since import/export is planned to get merged at about the same time, intentionally breaking unsafe/badly designed backup mechanisms is actually desirable.
--
Douglas Huff
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 881 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20110704/a85cd314/attachment.sig>