📅 Original date posted:2016-08-18 📝 Original message:Fine by me to update BIP68 ...

Btc Drak [ARCHIVE] /

npub1lhe…g7ed

2023-06-07 17:53:00

in reply to nevent1q…5tmg

📅 Original date posted:2016-08-18
📝 Original message:Fine by me to update BIP68 and BIP112 to Final status. The forks have
activated.

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Luke Dashjr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:

> Daniel Cousens opened the issue a few weeks ago, that BIP 9 should
> progress to
> Accepted stage. However, as an informational BIP, it is not entirely clear
> on
> whether it falls in the Draft/Accepted/Final classification of proposals
> requiring implementation, or the Draft/Active classification like process
> BIPs. Background of this discussion is at:
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/413
> (Discussion on the GitHub BIPs repo is *NOT* recommended, hence bringing
> this
> topic to the mailing list)
>
> Reviewing the criteria for status changes, my opinion is that:
> - BIPs 68, 112, 113, and 141 are themselves implementations of BIP 9
> -- therefore, BIP 9 falls under the Draft/Accepted/Final class
> - BIPs 68, 112, and 113 have been deployed to the network successfully
> -- therefore, BIP 9 has satisfied the conditions of not only Accepted
> status,
> but also Final status
> -- therefore, BIPs 68, 112, and 113 also ought to be Final status
>
> If there are no objections, I plan to update the status to Final for BIPs
> 9,
> 68, 112, and 113 in one month. Since all four BIPs are currently Draft, I
> also
> need at least one author from each BIP to sign-off on promoting them to
> (and
> beyond) Accepted.
>
> BIP 9: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille at gmail.com>
> Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org>
> Greg Maxwell <greg at xiph.org>
> Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
>
> BIP 68: Mark Friedenbach <mark at friedenbach.org>
> BtcDrak <btcdrak at gmail.com>
> Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier at gmail.com>
> kinoshitajona <kinoshitajona at gmail.com>
>
> BIP 112: BtcDrak <btcdrak at gmail.com>
> Mark Friedenbach <mark at friedenbach.org>
> Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo at gmail.com>
>
> BIP 113: Thomas Kerin <me at thomaskerin.io>
> Mark Friedenbach <mark at friedenbach.org>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160819/70d02f16/attachment.html>;

Author Public Key

npub1lhe3qfx2q5m7mq5d39waepf9lzhsy0cdey66svn63fyk6rt6n7ps7zg7ed

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 17:53:00

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "5814bfeeba7fd03b1a322b3d84f0f4d686d935671b1d841e8c75af5f23849981", "pubkey": "fdf31024ca0537ed828d895ddc8525f8af023f0dc935a8327a8a496d0d7a9f83", "created_at": 1686160380, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "e5b1f217538884704464bc77876f243407d191c4f528570ef530ac9c17a7efb6", "", "root" ], [ "e", "82de60388834b7f997d3dbc612538e460340837495d21d4707389707b60b9ee1", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-08-18\n📝 Original message:Fine by me to update BIP68 and BIP112 to Final status. The forks have\nactivated.\n\nOn Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Luke Dashjr \u003cluke at dashjr.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Daniel Cousens opened the issue a few weeks ago, that BIP 9 should\n\u003e progress to\n\u003e Accepted stage. However, as an informational BIP, it is not entirely clear\n\u003e on\n\u003e whether it falls in the Draft/Accepted/Final classification of proposals\n\u003e requiring implementation, or the Draft/Active classification like process\n\u003e BIPs. Background of this discussion is at:\n\u003e https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/413\n\u003e (Discussion on the GitHub BIPs repo is *NOT* recommended, hence bringing\n\u003e this\n\u003e topic to the mailing list)\n\u003e\n\u003e Reviewing the criteria for status changes, my opinion is that:\n\u003e - BIPs 68, 112, 113, and 141 are themselves implementations of BIP 9\n\u003e -- therefore, BIP 9 falls under the Draft/Accepted/Final class\n\u003e - BIPs 68, 112, and 113 have been deployed to the network successfully\n\u003e -- therefore, BIP 9 has satisfied the conditions of not only Accepted\n\u003e status,\n\u003e but also Final status\n\u003e -- therefore, BIPs 68, 112, and 113 also ought to be Final status\n\u003e\n\u003e If there are no objections, I plan to update the status to Final for BIPs\n\u003e 9,\n\u003e 68, 112, and 113 in one month. Since all four BIPs are currently Draft, I\n\u003e also\n\u003e need at least one author from each BIP to sign-off on promoting them to\n\u003e (and\n\u003e beyond) Accepted.\n\u003e\n\u003e BIP 9: Pieter Wuille \u003cpieter.wuille at gmail.com\u003e\n\u003e Peter Todd \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e\n\u003e Greg Maxwell \u003cgreg at xiph.org\u003e\n\u003e Rusty Russell \u003crusty at rustcorp.com.au\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e BIP 68: Mark Friedenbach \u003cmark at friedenbach.org\u003e\n\u003e BtcDrak \u003cbtcdrak at gmail.com\u003e\n\u003e Nicolas Dorier \u003cnicolas.dorier at gmail.com\u003e\n\u003e kinoshitajona \u003ckinoshitajona at gmail.com\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e BIP 112: BtcDrak \u003cbtcdrak at gmail.com\u003e\n\u003e Mark Friedenbach \u003cmark at friedenbach.org\u003e\n\u003e Eric Lombrozo \u003celombrozo at gmail.com\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e BIP 113: Thomas Kerin \u003cme at thomaskerin.io\u003e\n\u003e Mark Friedenbach \u003cmark at friedenbach.org\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160819/70d02f16/attachment.html\u003e", "sig": "7d47f21518c6e49b3ba46615aaf4c69edb3cd23ac8603e57b7fbfd0769c5f571a2edb4792fdfda3663dfcaa702e45e62caf491f4b05e9de7a5dd60e8682fcc3c" }