ReginaldOhLaw on Nostr: When the fetus is nonviable, there is NO “protect prenatal life” interest ...
When the fetus is nonviable, there is NO “protect prenatal life” interest implicated.
When that interest doesn’t apply, forcing women to carry a pregnancy to term is cruel and unusual, an arbitrary/capricious invasion of bodily autonomy, and may reflect gender animus.
Banning abortion such cases, therefore, implicates multiple constitutional doctrines and should be declared unconstitutional.
When that interest doesn’t apply, forcing women to carry a pregnancy to term is cruel and unusual, an arbitrary/capricious invasion of bodily autonomy, and may reflect gender animus.
Banning abortion such cases, therefore, implicates multiple constitutional doctrines and should be declared unconstitutional.