Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2015-06-10 š Original message:On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at ...
š
Original date posted:2015-06-10
š Original message:On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 03:12:02PM -0400, Andy Schroder wrote:
>
> Andy Schroder
>
> On 06/10/2015 03:03 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> >
> >>4. Seems like digital signatures are always broken on messages because
> >> the list server slightly modifies them (?), so my e-mail client
> >> doesn't verify them all.
> >What type of digital signatures specifically? What email client?
>
> I think they are usually PGP/MIME signatures that are not working
> right. If you'll notice from my e-mail headers:
>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
It might be that Thunderbird doesn't properly handle messages with both
signed and unsigned content. I use mutt myself, which handles it just
fine. (the sigs on your emails verify just fine for instance)
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0000000000000000134f9a433a4bece258b5035ecda33384f820a60493ca2887
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150610/d87cbc4a/attachment.sig>
š Original message:On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 03:12:02PM -0400, Andy Schroder wrote:
>
> Andy Schroder
>
> On 06/10/2015 03:03 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> >
> >>4. Seems like digital signatures are always broken on messages because
> >> the list server slightly modifies them (?), so my e-mail client
> >> doesn't verify them all.
> >What type of digital signatures specifically? What email client?
>
> I think they are usually PGP/MIME signatures that are not working
> right. If you'll notice from my e-mail headers:
>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
It might be that Thunderbird doesn't properly handle messages with both
signed and unsigned content. I use mutt myself, which handles it just
fine. (the sigs on your emails verify just fine for instance)
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0000000000000000134f9a433a4bece258b5035ecda33384f820a60493ca2887
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150610/d87cbc4a/attachment.sig>