Pieter Wuille [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-08-10 📝 Original message:On Aug 10, 2015 7:03 PM, ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-08-10
📝 Original message:On Aug 10, 2015 7:03 PM, "odinn via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
Note that I've
> been in favor of going ahead with Cameron Garnham's dynamic softfork
> proposal right now, which can be seen at http://is.gd/DiFuRr
No offence, but I think that anyone who claims a block size limit change
can be done as a soft fork has some basic reading to do first.
Also, please keep this thread about Lightning.
--
Pieter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150810/7032bed6/attachment.html>
📝 Original message:On Aug 10, 2015 7:03 PM, "odinn via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
Note that I've
> been in favor of going ahead with Cameron Garnham's dynamic softfork
> proposal right now, which can be seen at http://is.gd/DiFuRr
No offence, but I think that anyone who claims a block size limit change
can be done as a soft fork has some basic reading to do first.
Also, please keep this thread about Lightning.
--
Pieter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150810/7032bed6/attachment.html>