inventor on Nostr: Ask yourself why you are not fan of the idea in the first place. Who hijacked the ...
Ask yourself why you are not fan of the idea in the first place.
Who hijacked the word?
What excuses did he make to turn the goal into an imperative?
What human vulnerabilities he exploited?
What methods he proposed to achieve the goal?
What was the role of centralization in his plan?
I am not talking utopia (as the hijackers do), I'm talking a way of living that many already practice today in real life, and they couldn't imagine living their lives in any other way.
Without "conflicts", without "classes", without envy, without centralization, without violence, and based on the purest form of solidarity.
The hijacking served for the purpose of inoculation.
That is why your philosophical immune system rejects -at sight- the idea in its pure form and without the "additives".
Who hijacked the word?
What excuses did he make to turn the goal into an imperative?
What human vulnerabilities he exploited?
What methods he proposed to achieve the goal?
What was the role of centralization in his plan?
I am not talking utopia (as the hijackers do), I'm talking a way of living that many already practice today in real life, and they couldn't imagine living their lives in any other way.
Without "conflicts", without "classes", without envy, without centralization, without violence, and based on the purest form of solidarity.
The hijacking served for the purpose of inoculation.
That is why your philosophical immune system rejects -at sight- the idea in its pure form and without the "additives".