🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 on Nostr: npub1jflcd…gfmdd Ok, but “if she supported Hamas” … she almost kinda sorta ...
npub1jflcdvljl0n8hlz27798d0044rxwkqz69gapvcctt4p4gdt4kasqjgfmdd (npub1jfl…fmdd) Ok, but “if she supported Hamas” … she almost kinda sorta did? And you didn’t quote everything.
Agreed, a few more posts have come up since I posted that I didnt know about… After looking them up in context none of them change my opinion. She was supporting the palestinians and the freedom fighters, but she didnt at any point support the war crimes or the hamas (remember not everything that took place was the hamas, this all started with a civilian riot). The snarky “I can’t believe the Zionist apartheid regime is being brought down by guerrilla fighters in fake Gucci shirts” feels like grave dancing.
That also wasnt the whole quote and the rest of it is quite important.
The full quote is this: “I can’t believe the Zionist apartheid regime is being brought down by guerrilla fighters in fake Gucci shirts — the biopics of these moments better reflect that.”
To me this came across more as saying “The big bad rich bully who has been bombing and killing off my people for 80 years are going to be taken down by a punch of people with no resources, just a bunch of crazy people with sticks… the documentaries better show that”…
To me this is her mocking the very thing her people has been tortured with her whole life. They have murdered and killed her people with a vastly overpowered asymetry (as the result of foreign intervention) and she finds it poetic justice that a bunch of random people with little to no resources are able to topple that.
There is also a point she made that is interesting… 100% of isralis must join the military. While not all are currently active military that means 100% of citizens (not people) were actively military at one point. In their eyes that makes them valid targets… not saying i agree. and i still wont justify these actions… but there is a nugget of logic there. the overwhelming majority of isralis are people who choose to migrate to a land that belond to someone else, choose to pick up a gun, and choose to take the land away from those people.. Even if now they are civilians and out of service, that makes them a valid target in their minds… again.. I dont agree , but I see their logic.
Palestinians on the other hand arent there by choice, they were already there for a very very long time, and when israel invaded by all coming from around th world and gathering, the palestinians, who werent coming from anywhere but already there couldnt leave. So there is a logic there where most (not all( israeli citizens are guilty for supporting genocide by their very presence there. Palestnians not so much.
Anyway im ranting.. none of that JUSTIFIES it. I still see what hamas did as war crimes… but all I can say is when you take a population shove them into an open-air prison for 80 years and continually turn off their water and electricity and commit genocide… the natural consequence of that is the people will become increasing desperate and racicalized.. it odesnt maike it right, but it does make it understandable.
Agreed, a few more posts have come up since I posted that I didnt know about… After looking them up in context none of them change my opinion. She was supporting the palestinians and the freedom fighters, but she didnt at any point support the war crimes or the hamas (remember not everything that took place was the hamas, this all started with a civilian riot). The snarky “I can’t believe the Zionist apartheid regime is being brought down by guerrilla fighters in fake Gucci shirts” feels like grave dancing.
That also wasnt the whole quote and the rest of it is quite important.
The full quote is this: “I can’t believe the Zionist apartheid regime is being brought down by guerrilla fighters in fake Gucci shirts — the biopics of these moments better reflect that.”
To me this came across more as saying “The big bad rich bully who has been bombing and killing off my people for 80 years are going to be taken down by a punch of people with no resources, just a bunch of crazy people with sticks… the documentaries better show that”…
To me this is her mocking the very thing her people has been tortured with her whole life. They have murdered and killed her people with a vastly overpowered asymetry (as the result of foreign intervention) and she finds it poetic justice that a bunch of random people with little to no resources are able to topple that.
There is also a point she made that is interesting… 100% of isralis must join the military. While not all are currently active military that means 100% of citizens (not people) were actively military at one point. In their eyes that makes them valid targets… not saying i agree. and i still wont justify these actions… but there is a nugget of logic there. the overwhelming majority of isralis are people who choose to migrate to a land that belond to someone else, choose to pick up a gun, and choose to take the land away from those people.. Even if now they are civilians and out of service, that makes them a valid target in their minds… again.. I dont agree , but I see their logic.
Palestinians on the other hand arent there by choice, they were already there for a very very long time, and when israel invaded by all coming from around th world and gathering, the palestinians, who werent coming from anywhere but already there couldnt leave. So there is a logic there where most (not all( israeli citizens are guilty for supporting genocide by their very presence there. Palestnians not so much.
Anyway im ranting.. none of that JUSTIFIES it. I still see what hamas did as war crimes… but all I can say is when you take a population shove them into an open-air prison for 80 years and continually turn off their water and electricity and commit genocide… the natural consequence of that is the people will become increasing desperate and racicalized.. it odesnt maike it right, but it does make it understandable.