Event JSON
{
"id": "5b019a36b9e81ba74ad2b898372b1f9c5df3ccd0effa8a7e9b340fc8ad9dba0e",
"pubkey": "32884e4a56f9ef9cfd298a8e911a9f0c3c09e4d1cedec22761c868f4c7546eaa",
"created_at": 1711018840,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"b43cfc262e5c5f09a90094dd51496df096e9cfa0aa48fe882d62febba3d900c2",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"675830674868b40aa5a0704f2d150b4c07658775c20aa65b1e38b13a91469c4b",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"530848ad30d83cdcceae02e300116bd4493b5060a1d0ecd27078c93ac6ec980f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"t",
"curses"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/sellathechemist/statuses/112133330729157794",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1ks70cf3wt30sn2gqjnw4zjtd7ztwnnaq4fy0azpdvtlthg7eqrpqlteg5u There's a great article by CJ van der Veen that is probably not open access (#curses) which summarises how Fourier argued the case, given that so little was understood about the physics or radiation. It was a very cunning argument about heat and although it was ultimately wrong in detail it set the scene for Pouillet to do it rather better. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10889370009377693",
"sig": "af8b2af8a397a1323523c3d354a371cb127f0e1d736b031a9b47f11590de0ab757d4b6fb5e5227ba022ebad3b22181afb66c211661b7c68a277887fb011e384d"
}
