Jeff Garzik [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2011-07-04 🗒️ Summary of this message: Discussion ...

📅 Original date posted:2011-07-04
🗒️ Summary of this message: Discussion about the priority of fixing downgrade-to-0.3.24 in Bitcoin software, with a suggestion to agree on a specific pull request.
📝 Original message:On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> All that needs to happen for that is to agree on either
>> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/378 or
>> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/381';
>
> I don't think 0.3.24 "needs" either of those pulls.  Fixing
> downgrade-to-0.3.24 is low on the priority list, because
> downgrade-to-something-before-0.3.24 is just about as likely, and that
> has to do something mostly reasonable.

Yeah, same thoughts here.

> I just pulled https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/379 "Do not use
> comma as thousands separator", and pulled a block-chain lock-in at
> block 13444.  Those were the only issues I think really need to be in
> 0.3.24.

Tagged -tip as -rc2.

Bug reports are mostly quiet, so maybe we can even get the release
before you leave.

--
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
jgarzik at exmulti.com