Unhandled on Nostr: Sure. Peertube, Gitlab, Blockchain info, your personal blog or website, OBSD SVN, ...
Sure.
Peertube, Gitlab, Blockchain info, your personal blog or website, OBSD SVN, IEEE explore, Pixelfed, Wikipedia, Wikitionary, Commons, XDA, Stack Overflow, Arch Package Maintainers Directory, pine64 forum, Federal Bar List of Attorneys, w3c Working Group Chairs Personal Profile, arXiv, Bitcoin...
But even if you just consider these 3 tomorrow f.i. gists can change or require special access, which would make more suitable to publish the proof in other way.
Is it an imposible task to abstract a template to create standards? Otherwise I think I'd simply get rid with a field for links plus a "verify this proof by yourself clicking here". Maybe I'm wrong though.
Peertube, Gitlab, Blockchain info, your personal blog or website, OBSD SVN, IEEE explore, Pixelfed, Wikipedia, Wikitionary, Commons, XDA, Stack Overflow, Arch Package Maintainers Directory, pine64 forum, Federal Bar List of Attorneys, w3c Working Group Chairs Personal Profile, arXiv, Bitcoin...
But even if you just consider these 3 tomorrow f.i. gists can change or require special access, which would make more suitable to publish the proof in other way.
Is it an imposible task to abstract a template to create standards? Otherwise I think I'd simply get rid with a field for links plus a "verify this proof by yourself clicking here". Maybe I'm wrong though.