GrumpyRabbit on Nostr: _Who Decides 'Misinformation'?_ 'Misinformation,' like beauty, is in the eye of the ...
_Who Decides 'Misinformation'?_
'Misinformation,' like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. That's why juries of twelve members decide guilt by unanimous verdict, not judges. And why peer review of scientific papers is essential. And why a theory MUST be falsifiable, at least in principle, in order to semantically qualify as scientific.
Truth is subjective. And that includes the preceding sentence. See "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Thomas Kuhn,) and also "The Retreat to Commitment" (William Bartley,) and finally Quine's "Web of Belief."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwXbggFKvEE
'Misinformation,' like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. That's why juries of twelve members decide guilt by unanimous verdict, not judges. And why peer review of scientific papers is essential. And why a theory MUST be falsifiable, at least in principle, in order to semantically qualify as scientific.
Truth is subjective. And that includes the preceding sentence. See "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Thomas Kuhn,) and also "The Retreat to Commitment" (William Bartley,) and finally Quine's "Web of Belief."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwXbggFKvEE